Voiding cystourethrograms.

Because of serious radiographic-induced skin injuries that may have been caused by the inappropriate use of fluoroscopy during the performance of radiograph-guided invasive procedures, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an advisory in 1994 suggesting that the key to preventing such unfortunate mishaps may be physician education, training, and credentialing in the safe operation of fluoroscopic equipment. The purpose of this article is to familiarize the interventional pain medicine physician with the physics of ionizing radiation and how to limit patient exposure through the optimum setting of tube current and voltage, the use of limited beam-on time, tight collimation, and the elimination of the nonessential use of the magnification mode on a fluoroscopy unit. In addition, the use of personal protection equipment and the knowledge needed to interpret the personal exposure record of each practitioner is discussed. All of this information will assist the interventional pain medicine physician in meeting the recommended FDA training and credentialing requirements.

Fluoroscopy↗

PubMed2004

Brief report: validation of a system for automated measurement of knee laxity.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy and repeatability of an automated quantitative fluoroscopic imaging system for measuring knee laxity. DESIGN: Cadaveric validation study. BACKGROUND: Current methods of measuring anterior-posterior laxity lack sufficient accuracy and repeatability. A commercially developed fluoroscopic software package, capable of measuring laxity, required validation. METHODS: Five human cadaveric knees were used. A constant force of 130 N was applied anteriorly and posteriorly in turn to the tibia of each knee with the femur fixed in 30 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion. Quantitative fluoroscopic measurements of anterior-posterior laxity were determined using image analysis software. Fluoroscopic results were compared to the true anterior-posterior displacements of the tibia, which were simultaneously recorded using linear transducers directly attached to the cadaveric specimens. RESULTS: The quantitative fluoroscopic method underestimated laxity by an average of 0.40 mm with a root mean square error of 0.49 mm. The 95% confidence intervals for anterior and posterior laxity error were calculated to be -0.99 to 0.25 mm and -0.89 to 0.03 mm, respectively, where a negative error represents an underestimation. CONCLUSIONS: The quantitative fluoroscopic method offers a dramatic improvement in accuracy over current laxity measurement techniques and acceptable repeatability for assessing ligament damage. RELEVANCE: The considerably more accurate, validated measurement system of this study could improve ligament assessment and diagnosis, and the recognition of injuries otherwise undetected with current methods.

Fluoroscopy↗