PubMed · 13088538
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
K HOLUBEC. 1953-05-20. [Deep burns].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13088538/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Burn injuries trigger complex immune responses and gene expression changes, impacting wound healing and systemic inflammation. Understanding these changes is crucial for identifying biomarkers and therapeutic targets. METHODS: We analyzed two gene expression omnibus datasets (wound tissue [GSE8056] and blood [GSE37069]) to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in burn injury samples versus controls. Immune cell proportions were assessed using CIBERSORT. Functional enrichment analyses (Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) and protein-protein interaction networks were constructed to identify key genes and pathways. RESULTS: We identified 1170 upregulated and 1227 downregulated DEGs. Gene Ontology analysis revealed enrichment in neutrophil activation, inflammatory response, and extracellular matrix organization. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis highlighted cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, TNF, and IL-17 signaling pathways. Immune infiltration analysis showed significant changes in neutrophils, macrophages (M1/M2), and T-cell subsets. Protein-protein interaction network analysis identified five hub genes: JUN, STAT1, Bcl2, MMP9, and TLR2. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive bioinformatic analysis of gene expression and immune responses in burn injuries. The identified DEGs, hub genes, and pathways offer insights into the immune response mechanisms and suggest potential targets for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in burn injury management.
When patients with an implanted contraceptive device undergo MRI, it must be ensured that the examination involves no risk to the patient (MR safety) and that the diagnosis is not affected by artifacts or the function of the device compromised (MR compatibility). Two basic types of intrauterine devices can be distinguished: the metal-containing/metal-free intrauterine device (IUD) and the hormone-containing implant, the fully metal-free intrauterine system (IUS), as well as the ESSURE insert made of stainless steel, which has been approved for use in Europe since February 2001. The metal-containing and metal-free IUDs and ESSURE are MRI compatible up to a magnetic field strength of 1.5 T. They do not interact in any relevant way with the external magnetic or high-frequency field and the temperature increase is within the physiologic range. The implants merely produce a local signal void with a shape that depends on their orientation relative to the magnetic field lines. At 3 T, only the metal-free IUD and the IUS are MRI safe in terms of the material used. In contrast, metal-containing IUDs and the ESSURE have not yet been fully evaluated in the 3 T field, which is why they represent a contraindication to MRI. No data are available on the MRI compatibility at 3 T for any of these devices.
OBJECTIVE: Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms are a focus of much research with older children, but little research has been conducted with young children, who account for about 50% of all pediatric burn injuries. This is a 3-year study of 12- to 48-month-old acutely burned children to assess acute traumatic stress outcomes. The aims were to (1) assess the prevalence of acute traumatic stress symptoms and (2) develop a model of risk factors for these symptoms in these children. METHOD: Acute stress symptoms were measured using the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Semi-Structured Interview and Observational Record for Infants and Young Children. Children's responses were then assessed, including behavior and physiological measures for developmental/functional consequences. A path analysis strategy was used to build a model of risk factors. Risk factors assessed in this model included observed pain (Visual Analogue Scale), parent symptoms (Stanford Acute Stress Reaction Questionnaire), and magnitude of trauma (total body surface area burned). RESULTS: Of the 64 subjects meeting inclusion criteria, 52 subjects agreed to participate. These children were highly symptomatic; almost 30% of these children had acute stress symptoms. A path analysis model yielded two independent pathways to acute stress symptoms: (1) from the size of the burn to the mean pulse rate in the hospital to acute stress symptoms and (2) from the child's pain to the parents' stress symptoms to acute stress symptoms. This model accounted for 39% of the variance of acute stress symptoms and yielded excellent fit indexes. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of acute stress symptoms were identified in young children with burns. A model of risk factors, including the size of the burn, pain, pulse rate, and parents' symptoms, was identified.