PubMed · 13120375
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
N T SPRATT. 1954. Physiological mechanisms in development.. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1954.34.1.1
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Androgens play a key role in human fetal development. All androgens act through a single intracellular androgen receptor (AR), which is encoded by a single copy gene on the X chromosome. ARs are expressed as early as 9 weeks in the epithelium and mesenchyme of the urogenital sinus, paramesonephric (Müllerian) and mesonephric (Wolffian) ducts. METHODS: Using immunohistochemistry, we investigated the distribution of ARs in the gonads and lower genital tracts of 54 human fetuses at 8-11 weeks of gestation. Gender was determined by PCR. RESULTS: The AR was expressed in a similar pattern in both male and female fetuses. There appears to be no difference in expression in the mesonephros or the mesonephric ducts when male and female pelvises were compared. Expression in the female paramesonephric duct was within the epithelium, whereas, in the male pelvises, expression was in the mesenchyme of the paramesonephric duct. When AR expression was compared in the ovary and testes, both gonads seem to express AR at 9 weeks, but this expression was extended into the 10th week of gestation in the male. CONCLUSION: The specific pattern of AR expression implies a key role in gonadal development. However, the pattern of staining was similar in the gonads at 8 and 9 weeks in both sexes, although staining persisted longer in the testis until the 10th week. AR expression, therefore, is not a key determinant of human gonadal differentiation.
Embryo donation, although proposed in a number of ART centres in the world is more often contemplated than performed, and very few publications report results on this subject. There is a great variability in program procedures and policies according to centres in the same country and between countries. In France, this activity is developing slowly. This is due to both the absence of information on the way to organise this activity at the medical level, and to legal constraints imposed by law.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.