PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1318466

Developments in avian leukosis research.

Abstract

Infection by exogenous avian leukosis viruses (ALVs) causes economic loss from neoplastic mortality and from impaired performance of subclinically infected chickens. This paper reviews progress in research related to natural infection and its control. Subgroup A ALVs causing lymphoid leukosis are the most common viruses in the field, but variant viruses can arise and cause losses. In Israel in recent years, epidemic outbreaks of haemangiosarcomas caused by a virus of unusual cytopathogenicity have occurred. In the UK, an ALV belonging to a new subgroup for chickens has been recently isolated; this virus is able to cause myeloid leukosis and nephromas. ALV infection of commercial stock is controlled by virus eradication schemes that prevent vertical transmission of ALV from one generation to the next. In this regard, endogenous leukosis viruses and ev loci, notably ev21 linked to the K slow-feathering gene, have been shown to have a detrimental influence on responses to infection by exogenous ALVs, and on the success of eradication schemes. Tolerogenic properties of the ev loci are involved. Attention has also been directed to whether ev loci have any direct influence on performance traits. Although eradication provides the main means of controlling ALV, the development of transgenic techniques in chickens has renewed interest in genetic resistance, and some progress has also been made in developing recombinant vaccines.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L N Payne. 1992. Developments in avian leukosis research.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1318466/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Detection of two porcine circovirus type 2 genotypic groups in United States swine herds.

In late 2005, sporadic cases of an acute onset disease of high mortality were observed in 10- to 16-week-old growing pigs among several swine herds of the United States. Tissues from the affected pigs in Kansas, Iowa, and North Carolina were examined, and porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) was detected consistently among these tissues. Phylogenetically, PCV2 can be divided into two major genotypic groups, PCV2-group 1 and PCV2-group 2. Whereas PCV2-group 1 isolates were detected in all the diseased animals, only two of the diseased animals harbored PCV2-group 2 isolates. This observation is important because PCV2-group 1 isolates had never been reported in the United States before (GenBank as of May 16, 2006), and they are closely related to the PCV2-group 1 isolates that have been described in Europe and Asia, previously. Our analysis revealed that each genotypic group contains a distinct stretch of nucleotide or amino acid sequence that may serve as a signature motif for PCV2-group 1 or PCV2-group 2 isolates.

Animal Husbandry↗

Performance of gestating sows in bedded hoop barns and confinement stalls.

The effects of gestation housing systems on sow and litter performance were evaluated for 2.5 yr in southwest Iowa. Gestation housing system treatments were as follows: 1) individual gestation stalls in a mechanically ventilated confinement building with a partially slatted floor and a manure flush system and 2) group pens with individual feed stalls in deep-bedded, naturally ventilated hoop barns. In all, 957 litters from 353 sows were evaluated. Number of pigs born alive per litter differed for the 2 housing treatments (P = 0.002). Sows gestated in hoop barns gave birth to more live pigs per litter (10.0 +/- 0.2 pigs) than sows gestated in stalls (9.3 +/- 0.2 pigs). Preweaning mortality was not different for the 2 housing treatments (P = 0.70). Cross-fostering was done to equalize litter size within 24 h of birth, which resulted in an equal number of weaned pigs per sow (P = 0.50) regardless of gestation housing treatment. The weaning-to-breeding interval was different (P = 0.01), with sows kept in stalls (4.3 +/- 0.6 d) returning to estrus sooner than sows gestated in hoop barns (6.0 +/- 0.6 d). These results indicate that gestating sows can be housed as groups in deep-bedded hoop barns equipped with individual feeding stalls and will perform comparably to gestating sows housed in confinement systems with individual gestation stalls.

Animal Husbandry↗