PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 13202088

[Volume of plexiglass permitting compression simultaneous with utilization with luminous centering apparatus in radiotherapy].

N POULIQUEN
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Data CompressionHumansLicensurePolymethyl MethacrylatePressureRadiotherapyRADIOTHERAPYJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N POULIQUEN. 1954. [Volume of plexiglass permitting compression simultaneous with utilization with luminous centering apparatus in radiotherapy].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13202088/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

FFC: a scalable FASTA compressor.

SUMMARY: FASTA is a widely used text-based format for storing nucleotide and protein sequences. The existing FASTA compressors usually focus on (slightly) improving the compression ratio, not on practical performance. We present FFC, a scalable FASTA compressor that achieves average compression speeds 4.7× and 11.4× higher than two high-performance compressors, zstd and NAF, respectively, across a benchmark set of seven single genomes. It also delivers average decompression speeds 3.5× and 2.7× higher than zstd and NAF, respectively. Although a chunk-based zstd variant with parallel decompression, pzstd, almost matches FFC speed, its compression ratio is on average by 23% worse than FFC's. For the experiment, a 14-core workstation and a RAM disk (to reduce the impact of I/O) were used. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: FFC is freely available at github.com/kowallus/ffc and also as a Zenodo repository at 10.5281/zenodo.18892353, and the used datasets at 10.5281/zenodo.18873744.

Data Compression↗
PubMed2006

Wavelet-based medical image compression with adaptive prediction.

A lossless wavelet-based image compression method with adaptive prediction is proposed. Firstly, we analyze the correlations between wavelet coefficients to identify a proper wavelet basis function, then predictor variables are statistically test to determine which relative wavelet coefficients should be included in the prediction model. At last, prediction differences are encoded by an adaptive arithmetic encoder. Instead of relying on a fixed number of predictors on fixed locations, we proposed the adaptive prediction approach to overcome the multicollinearity problem. The proposed innovative approach integrating correlation analysis for selecting wavelet basis function with predictor variable selection is fully achieving high accuracy of prediction. Experimental results show that the proposed approach indeed achieves a higher compression rate on CT, MRI and ultrasound images comparing with several state-of-the-art methods.

Data Compression↗
PubMed2006

Development and evaluation of different methods to assess download and display time of image web systems.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop and verify different methods of measuring time-to-display (TTD) for radiological images with image web systems (IWS). The process should be automatable in order to repeatedly perform a large number of measurements without human interaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three methods were defined and compared with respect to usability, stability, and quality of results. Method 1 was based on Windows 2000 Performance Monitor, whereas method 2 employed phototransistors taped to the screen and connected to a separate PC. A software tool developed for method 3, which used Windows application programming interface (API) function, calls to read the color code assigned to specific pixels on the screen. RESULTS: Method 3 proved to be the most reliable and easy to automate. The accuracy is practically equivalent to method 2, but it proved to be far more automatable. Method 1 produced the largest mean error, was easily disturbed, but was also easy to set up and provided additional insights into the system's architecture especially if combined with method 3. CONCLUSIONS: To measure the performance of image distribution systems, any of these methods can be used, but method 3 proved to be superior.

Data Compression↗