PubMed · 13263792
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
L R BURNHAM. 1955. Electrodiagnosis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13263792/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The objective of this report was to develop a case definition of "distal symmetrical polyneuropathy" to standardize and facilitate clinical research and epidemiological studies. A formalized consensus process was employed to reach agreement after a systematic review and classification of evidence from the literature. The literature indicates that symptoms alone have relatively poor diagnostic accuracy in predicting the presence of polyneuropathy; signs are better predictors of polyneuropathy than symptoms; and single abnormalities on examination are less sensitive than multiple abnormalities in predicting the presence of polyneuropathy. The combination of neuropathic symptoms, signs, and electrodiagnostic findings provides the most accurate diagnosis of distal symmetrical polyneuropathy. A set of case definitions was rank ordered by likelihood of disease. The highest likelihood of polyneuropathy (useful for clinical trials) occurs with a combination of multiple symptoms, multiple signs, and abnormal electrodiagnostic studies. A modest likelihood of polyneuropathy (useful for field or epidemiological studies) occurs with a combination of multiple symptoms and multiple signs when the results of electrodiagnostic studies are not available. A lower likelihood of polyneuropathy occurs when electrodiagnostic studies and signs are discordant. For research purposes, the best approach for defining distal symmetrical polyneuropathy is a set of case definitions rank ordered by estimated likelihood of disease. The inclusion of this formalized case definition in clinical and epidemiological research studies will ensure greater consistency of case selection.
The changes of gastric myoelectrical activity were investigated in 20 infants by cutaneous electrogastrography (EGG) before and after the surgical correction of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS). The dominance of 2-4 cycles per minute (CPM) "slow waves" is typical of the healthy gastric function. The shift of the dominant frequencies towards the slower frequency (0-2 CPM) is defined as bradygastria, whereas a shift towards the more frequent waves (4-10 CPM) is called tachygastria. Unlike with healthy infants, the electrogastrogram showed pathologic patterns in 85% (18 out of 20) of IHPS patients. In all except two of these infants with pathologic electrical patterns, the frequency of the waves significantly shifted towards tachygastria. The effect of feeding on the gastric myoelectrical activity could only be studied in limited (9/20) cases because of recurring vomiting during the preoperative period. In IHPS infants, a significant increase in the bradygastria group was observed in the postprandial period compared with healthy infants. Three to 5 days after surgical repair (pyloromyotomy) and the reintroduction of feeding in gradually increasing amounts, the gastric myoelectrical activity showed physiologic patterns again, showing that the pyloric function was back to normal. Cutaneous EGG is a useful, noninvasive method to obtain indirect information about the motor function of the stomach and might be further applicable to pediatric gastric motility disorders.
The development of the personal computer has simplified the process of quantitating sensory thresholds using various testing algorithms. We reviewed the technical aspects and reproducibility of different methods to determine threshold for light touch-pressure, vibration, thermal, and pain stimuli. Clinical uses and limitations of quantitative sensory testing (QST) were also reviewed. QST is a reliable psychophysical test of large- and small-fiber sensory modalities. The results of QST are highly dependent on methodology and the full cooperation of the subject. QST has been shown to be reasonably reproducible over a period of days or weeks in normal subjects. The use of QST in research and patient care should be limited to instruments and their corresponding methodologies that have been shown to be reproducible. Literature data do not allow conclusions regarding the relative merits of individual QST instruments.