PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1327176

Fundamental studies in reversed-phase liquid-solid extraction of basic drugs; I: Ionic interactions.

Abstract

Seven basic solutes with known and controlled pKa (7.93-9.5) and log P (0.23-6.63) values have been used as test probes to study the mechanism involved in liquid-solid extraction with C2 and C18 bonded silica phases. A limited comparison has also been made with underivatized silica and CN phases. In addition to the reversed-phase mechanism, cation-exchange was shown to play a very significant role in the retention process. Various cations both organic and inorganic were assessed for their elution strength, and the ordering was similar to that for classical ion-exchange chromatography. Control of selectivity in the elution process can be achieved by varying the concentration of cation or methanol in the eluent. The C2 cartridge in combination with an aqueous ammonium acetate-methanol eluent proved to be the most versatile in that all compounds, irrespective of pKa or log P could be recovered in high yield. The optimal eluent in terms of selectivity with respect to related compounds could be predicted from the solute log P. Blocking of silanols by pre-conditioning the cartridges with cations prior to sample applications was also studied. The order of cation strengths although somewhat variable was similar to that established at the elution stage. To achieve quantitative elution with methanol or aqueous methanol solutions however, high concentrations of inorganic cations, equivalent to 1 ml of a 1 M solution were required to pre-condition a 100 mg cartridge.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Law, S Weir, N A Ward. Fundamental studies in reversed-phase liquid-solid extraction of basic drugs; I: Ionic interactions.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0731-7085(92)80025-i

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Performance assessment of a zeolite treatment wall for removing Sr-90 from groundwater.

Laboratory and modeling studies were conducted to assess the potential performance of a permeable reactive barrier constructed of a natural zeolite material at the West Valley Demonstration Project in western New York State. The results of laboratory column tests indicated that the barrier material would be effective at removing strontium from groundwater under natural gradient conditions. Two one-dimensional contaminant transport models were developed to interpret the data. A single-solute retardation factor model provided good agreement with the column test data, but time-consuming extraction and analysis of the zeolite material was required to parameterize the model. A preliminary six-solute model was also developed based on the assumption of competitive cation exchange as the primary removal mechanism. Both models yielded similar predictions of the long-term performance of the barrier, but the cation exchange model predicted higher effluent concentrations during the first 1000 pore volumes of operation. The cation exchange framework has several advantages, including the ability to calibrate the model using only data from column effluent samples, and the ability to account for site-specific differences in the groundwater cation composition. However, additional laboratory work is needed to develop a suitably robust model.

Ion Exchange↗

Studies on the pretreatment of zeolite clinoptilolite in packed beds.

The effect of volumetric flow rate, ranging from 5 to 45 Bed Volumes per hour (BV h(-1)) and temperature, ranging from 25 to 59 degrees C, during pretreatment of clinoptilolite on its effective capacity has been investigated. Pretreatment tests have been performed in an upflow ion exchange bed. Increased temperatures were found to increase the effective capacity of clinoptilolite. Effective capacity was maximal at low volumetric flow rates, indicating an influence of contact time and complete saturation of the zeolite bed at flow rates lower than 10 BV h(-1). Furthermore, a comparison between upflow and downflow operation at the same operating conditions showed that better results are obtained in upflow conditions, probably due to the better wetting of the material and the absence of liquid maldistribution.

Ion Exchange↗