PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 13308456

Congenital ectodermal defect with amastia.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R A OSBOURN. 1956. Congenital ectodermal defect with amastia.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13308456/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Increased genotoxic susceptibility of breast epithelial cells to ethylene oxide.

This study was carried out with the aim of elucidating the organ-specific effects of ethylene oxide in comparison with the sensitivity of cells from different tissues. An increased incidence of leukemia and lymphoma has been observed in workers exposed to ethylene oxide. However, contradictory findings exist regarding its ability to induce other tumor types, such as breast cancer. We characterized the genotoxicity of ethylene oxide by means of the alkaline version of comet assay in in vitro systems, in order to investigate the hypothesized role of this substance in the development of breast cancer. For this study, we used primary and secondary cultures of lymphoblasts (well-known target cells of the genotoxicity of ethylene oxide), breast epithelial cells (hypothesized target), peripheral blood lymphocytes (cells commonly used in biomonitoring), and of keratinocytes and cervical epithelial cells. DNA damage was measured and expressed as tail DNA, tail length, and tail moment. In the concentration range 0-100 microM, ethylene oxide induced a dose-dependent increase of DNA damage in the investigated cell types without notable cytotoxicity. A statistically significant increase of DNA damage could be observed after treatment with 20 microM ethylene oxide in lymphoblasts (51% increase of tail moment over the background), breast epithelial cells (26% increase) and peripheral lymphocytes (71% increase). In keratinocytes (5% increase) and cervical epithelial cells (5% increase) significant DNA damage could not be detected at this dose, but at higher concentrations (50-100 microM), such an increase was observed. These results are indicative of an increased sensitivity of breast epithelial cells towards genotoxic insults of ethylene oxide. Our observations provide additional data to evaluate the hypothesis that exposure to ethylene oxide may play a role in breast cancer, and the findings may contribute to the development of screening tests for monitoring an early response to genotoxic insults in occupational settings.

Breast↗

Molecular mechanisms of the 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-induced inverted U-shaped dose responsiveness in anchorage independent growth and cell proliferation of human breast epithelial cells with stem cell characteristics.

Although 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) has a variety of carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic effects in experimental animals, its role in human carcinogenicity remain controversial. A simian virus 40-immortalized cell line from normal human breast epithelial cells with stem cells and luminal characteristics (M13SV1) was used to study whether TCDD can induce AIG positive colony formation and cause increased cell numbers in a inverted U-shaped dose-response manner. TCDD activated Akt, ERK2, and increased the expression of CYP1A1, PAI-2, IL-lb mRNA, and ERK2 protein levels. TCDD was able to increased phosphorylation and expression of ERK2 in same dose-response manner as AIG positive colony formation. Thus, TCDD induced tumorigenicity in M13SV1, possibly through the phosphorylation of ERK2 and/or Akt. Further, cDNA microarray with 7448 sequence-verified clones was used to profile various gene expression patterns after treatment of TCDD. Three clear patterns could be delineated: genes that were dose-dependently up-regulated, genes expressed in either U-shape and/or inverted U-shape. The fact that these genes are intrinsically related to breast epithelial cell proliferation and survival clearly suggests that they may be involved in the TCDD-induced breast tumorigenesis.

Breast↗

Breast stimulation for cervical ripening and induction of labour.

BACKGROUND: Breast stimulation has been suggested as a means of inducing labour. It is a non-medical intervention allowing women greater control over the induction process. This is one of a series of reviews of methods of cervical ripening and labour induction using a standardised methodology. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of breast stimulation for third trimester cervical ripening or induction of labour in comparison with placebo/no intervention or other methods of induction of labour. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (March 2004) and bibliographies of relevant papers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Clinical trials of breast stimulation for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A strategy was developed to deal with the large volume and complexity of trial data relating to labour induction. This involved a two-stage method of data extraction. MAIN RESULTS: Six trials (719 women) were included. Analysis of trials comparing breast stimulation with no intervention found a significant reduction in the number of women not in labour at 72 hours (62.7% versus 93.6%, relative risk (RR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60 to 0.74). This result was not significant in women with an unfavourable cervix. A major reduction in the rate of postpartum haemorrhage was reported (0.7% versus 6%, RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.87). No significant difference was detected in the caesarean section rate (9% versus 10%, RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.38 to 2.12) or rates of meconium staining. There were no instances of uterine hyperstimulation. Three perinatal deaths were reported (1.8% versus 0%, RR 8.17, 95% CI 0.45 to 147.77). When comparing breast stimulation with oxytocin alone the analysis found no difference in caesarean section rates (28% versus 47%, RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.18). No difference was detected in the number of women not in labour after 72 hours (58.8% versus 25%, RR 2.35, 95% CI 1.00 to 5.54) or rates of meconium staining. There were four perinatal deaths (17.6% versus 5%, RR 3.53, 95% CI 0.40 to 30.88). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Breast stimulation appears beneficial in relation to the number of women not in labour after 72 hours, and reduced postpartum haemorrhage rates. Until safety issues have been fully evaluated it should not be used in high-risk women. Further research is required to evaluate its safety, and should seek data on postpartum haemorrhage rates, number of women not in labour at 72 hours and maternal satisfaction.

Breast↗