PubMed · 13337951
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
F SIMON. 1956. [New prostheses].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13337951/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
An electromechanical system is described that comprises a cam and two linear displacement transducers for measuring two-degree of freedom. This is aimed at quantifying the extent and pattern of both transverse rotation and longitudinal translation that takes place during amputee gait at what is sometimes termed a "torque-shock absorbing adapter" located between the prosthetic socket and foot. Both types of motion are measured independently by mounting the cam around the adapter and the two transducers orthogonal to one another with their spring loaded plungers moving separately against the cam's perimeter and distal, flat face. The cam geometry should be an arc of a spiral and not a circle for the angular displacement measurement to be linear in response to rotation. Over a range of +/-18 degrees for transverse rotation the maximum deviation of the ideal cam geometry away from an arc of a circle is less than +/-0.5% of the transducers' 10 mm stroke. The transducer's linearity is +/-2% and it could therefore be assumed that this would be the dominant source of error. The theoretical predictions are supported by the calibration results, in which the pattern of errors that are found in the transducers' calibration can also be seen in the calibration of the cam.
In the process of guideline development for prosthetic prescription in the Netherlands the authors made a study of the daily clinical practice of lower limb prosthetics. Besides the evidence-based knowledge from literature the more implicit knowledge from clinical experts is of importance for guideline development. In order to obtain this information the authors performed both an observational study of clinical practice and an interview study with 11 clinical experts from the three key disciplines in this field. The latter study is presented here as a descriptive and qualitative study. The combination of the opinions on prescription criteria given in these semi-structured interviews appeared divided with regard to various options in the prescription of a lower limb prosthesis. However, the implicit knowledge is considered by the authors of importance for the consensus procedure on guideline development. Prosthetic prescription criteria seem to be based on local experience and partly on assumptions. A consensus procedure can lead to improvement of the knowledge about prosthetic prescription.