PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 1337767

[Sumatriptan--future development, alternative features and potential new indications].

Abstract

Sumatriptan is a highly selective 5 HT1 receptor subtype agonist. The efficacy and safety profiles of sumatriptan given by tablet or subcutaneous injection have been extensively investigated in the acute treatment of migraine attacks, where it has proved effective and well tolerated. A substantial proportion of patients with an acute attack of migraine suffer from once or more gastrointestinal symptom, including nausea, vomiting and occasionally diarrhoea. The presence of these symptoms may make the oral administration of acute treatments unsatisfactory. Subcutaneous administration is an alternative, but fear or dislike of injections or an inability to self inject makes subcutaneous treatment unacceptable to some patients. Alternative routes of administration are being investigated to overcome these difficulties including intranasal sprays and rectal suppositories. For those patients who experience difficulties swallowing whole tablets, an effervescent tablet is under development. Recent data have demonstrated that sumatriptan offers effective relief of cluster headache attacks, a condition where suffers experience repeated severe headache attacks, of short duration, during a cluster period. Further new indications are being investigated including the treatment of menstrual migraine, paediatric migraine and other headaches.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W S Arnold. 1992. [Sumatriptan--future development, alternative features and potential new indications].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1337767/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Adjuvanted oral vaccines should not induce allergic responses to dietary antigens.

Oral vaccines may contain adjuvants which might elicit allergies against dietary proteins. Four antigens were used to measure such an effect--ovalbumin, soya bean protein, lactalbumin and gluten. Neither guinea pigs nor mice showed IgE responses after oral administration of adjuvanted vaccines containing lactalbumin and gluten. No IgE responses were detected in mice with any of these antigens after oral immunization, but, in the guinea pig, nine out of 18 animals reacted to either ovalbumin or soya bean protein and none reacted to lactalbumin and gluten. It is concluded that the risk of allergy induction against normal dietary proteins is low but such tests should be applied to potential adjuvanted oral vaccines to measure any possible contraindication, especially with atopic individuals.

Administration, Oral