PubMed · 13413440
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R THUREL. 1957. [Lumbar sciatica caused by herniated disk].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13413440/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Chronic monotone back pain is no pressing indication for radiographic procedures, but chronic progressive or symptomatic back pain should be investigated by radiographic means. Beneath conventional radiology and computed tomography (CT) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become a more method of standard in these cases. The radiographic investigation of back pain is shown in cases of discal and vertebral degeneration and spondylitis. Typical signs and differential diagnosis are demonstrated. After demonstration of radiological means. After introduction and valuation of radiological means, as conventional radiography, CT, MRI, myelography and scintigraphy, it is entered into degenerative changes and degenerative diseases of vertebra endplates and vertebra bodies as a reason of pain. Reasons of spinal stenosis are discussed. In case of inflammatory changes, bacterial inflammation of vertebrae and intervertebral joints are represented. Changes of spondylodiscitis/spondylitis are opposed to inflammatory changes of Morbus Bechterew and Morbus Scheuermann.
BACKGROUND: Pain therapy is not an obligatory subject of undergraduate medical education in Germany. METHODS: In order to evaluate the expectations of undergraduate medical students regarding pain therapy as a lecture, a questionnaire was distributed to students visiting a faculty lecture on pain therapy. RESULTS: The main topics voted by the students as very interesting to them were pain syndromes such as low back pain, headache, and cancer pain. Furthermore, pharmacotherapy and the structure of pain therapy units were voted as interesting. Female students were significantly more interested in pain problems of specific patient groups (women, children, older patients, HIV-infected patients). Case reports on paper or with patient presentations were regarded as the most important didactic elements of such lectures. CONCLUSIONS: An analysis of the published undergraduate curricula in pain therapy revealed that the curriculum of the IASP and of the EFIC are too long and too theoretical, respectively. The curriculum of the DGSS meets many expectations of the students in this survey. Concepts of pain therapy education in undergraduate medical schools should consider the wishes of students regarding knowledge of pain syndromes and didactic methods.
STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review. OBJECTIVES: To determine the quality of the research and assess the interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability of spinal palpatory diagnostic procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Conflicting data have been reported over the past 35 years regarding the reliability of spinal palpatory tests. METHODS: The authors used 13 electronic databases and manually searched the literature from January 1, 1966 to October 1, 2001. Forty-nine (6%) of 797 primary research articles met the inclusion criteria. Two blinded, independent reviewers scored each article. Consensus or a content expert reconciled discrepancies. RESULTS: The quality scores ranged from 25 to 79/100. Subject description, study design, and presentation of results were the weakest areas. The 12 highest quality articles found pain provocation, motion, and landmark location tests to have acceptable reliability (K = 0.40 or greater), but they were not always reproducible by other examiners under similar conditions. In those that used kappa statistics, a higher percentage of the pain provocation studies (64%) demonstrated acceptable reliability, followed by motion studies (58%), landmark (33%), and soft tissue studies (0%). Regional range of motion is more reliable than segmental range of motion, and intraexaminer reliability is better than interexaminer reliability. Overall, examiners' discipline, experience level, consensus on procedure used, training just before the study, or use of symptomatic subjects do not improve reliability. CONCLUSION: The quality of the research on interreliability and intrareliability of spinal palpatory diagnostic procedures needs to be improved. Pain provocation tests are most reliable. Soft tissue paraspinal palpatory diagnostic tests are not reliable.