PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 13417094

Agents affecting apomorphine-induced vomiting.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E M BOYD, W A CASSELL. 1957. Agents affecting apomorphine-induced vomiting.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13417094/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A comparative, crossover study of the efficacy and safety of sildenafil and apomorphine in men with evidence of arteriogenic erectile dysfunction.

The aim of the study was to establish and compare the efficacy and safety of sildenafil and apomorphine in men with arteriogenic erectile dysfunction (ED). In all, 43 men with ED and postinjection max penile systolic velocity <25 cm/s in repeated Doppler ultrasonography were included. Of these, 24 men started on apomorphine 2 mg and 19 on sildenafil 50 mg, the doses titrated up to 3 and 100 mg according to effectiveness and tolerability. Safety was evaluated according to adverse events (AEs) and patient withdrawal. Efficacy was the percentage of attempts resulting in erections firm enough for intercourse, based on event log data. The incidence of AEs with apomorphine 3 mg was higher than with sildenafil 100 mg. Two men on apomorphine 3 mg discontinued treatment due to AEs. The overall success rate of sildenafil was 63.7% compared to 32.1% of apomorphine (Pearson chi(2), P<0.01). Of all men, 25 (58.1%) responded to sildenafil 50 mg without the need for dose increase, while only one responded to apomorphine 2 mg. The response to sildenafil 50 mg was age related (analysis of variance, p=0.04). Satisfaction was reported by 76.75 and 13.95% of patients for sildenafil and apomorphine, respectively, but 20.9% were not satisfied with any of the two drugs. In conclusion, this study provides clear evidence that sildenafil, even at 50 mg dose, is more effective than apomorphine 3 mg in men with arteriogenic ED. The fact that one out of five patients is not satisfied with the above-studied drugs shows that new oral agents need to be evaluated for the treatment of this disorder.

Apomorphine↗

Iontophoretic R-apomorphine delivery in combination with surfactant pretreatment: in vitro validation studies.

To validate the efficacy and controllability of a newly developed transdermal delivery system for R-apomorphine in combination with the surfactant pretreatment, iontophoresis was performed in three-chamber continuous-flow-through diffusion cells in vitro. The transdermal iontophoretic transport of R-apomorphine was examined with both human SC and freshly dermatomed human skin, at room temperature and at 32 degrees C. Furthermore, the relationship between current density and iontophoretic flux was investigated. By increasing the temperature from 22 to 32 degrees C, the iontophoretic transport rate of R-apomorphine in human SC was increased 1.9-fold. Also the iontophoretic flux increased linearly with the increase in the current density from 100 to 500 microA/cm(2). When using dermatomed human skin instead of SC, the iontophoretic flux at a current density of 500 microA/cm(2) was decreased from 362+/-45 to 259+/-30 nmol/cm(2)h, and the corresponding lag time was prolonged from 0.8 to 2.8h. In conclusion, the combination of non-occlusive pretreatment with the surfactant formulation and iontophoresis has shown to substantially increase the transdermal transport rate of R-apomorphine. A linear relationship between current density and R-apomorphine flux indicates that the iontophoretic delivery combined with surfactant pretreatment allows a controlled and individualised administration of R-apomorphine.

Apomorphine↗