PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 1346292

Customised antenatal growth charts.

Abstract

Charts for fetal growth do not take physiological variables into account. We have therefore designed a computer-generated antenatal chart that can be easily "customised" for each individual pregnancy, taking the mother's characteristics and birthweights from previous pregnancies into consideration. The adjusted birthweight range expected at 40 weeks' gestation is combined with a standard, longitudinal ultrasound-derived curve for intrauterine weight gain. Review at the Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK, of 4179 pregnancies with ultrasound-confirmed dates showed that, in addition to gestation and sex, maternal weight at first antenatal-clinic visit, height, ethnic group, and parity were significant determinants of birthweight in our population. Correction factors were calculated for each of these variables and entered into a computer program to adjust the normal birthweight centile limits. With adjusted centiles we found that 28% of babies conventionally designated small for gestational age (less than 10th centile) and 22% of those designated large (greater than 90th centile) were in fact within normal limits for the pregnancy. Conversely, 24% and 26% of babies identified as small or large, respectively, with adjusted centiles were "missed" by conventional unadjusted centile assessment. Adjustment for physiological variables will make assessment of fetal growth more precise and reduce unnecessary investigations, interventions, and parental anxiety.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Gardosi, A Chang, B Kalyan, D Sahota, E M Symonds. 1992-02-01. Customised antenatal growth charts.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(92)91342-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Prediction of light-for-gestational age at delivery in twin pregnancies: an evaluation of fetal weight deviation and growth discordance measured by ultrasound.

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate and discuss different ultrasound methods widely used, among other things, as predictors for light-for-gestational age (LGA) in twin pregnancies. The methods evaluated and compared as predictors for LGA at birth were: (1) Difference between twins in biparietal diameter; (2) difference in abdominal diameter; (3) the percentage difference in estimated fetal weight between twins; and (4) estimation of the weight deviation from the expected weight during pregnancy. The study comprised 66 twin pregnancies, examined by ultrasound scanning less than 15 days before delivery. Using Relative Operating Characteristic curves (ROC curves) estimated fetal weight deviation was the most sensitive and specific of the methods. It is stressed that fetal discordance is not the appropriate predictor of LGA at birth in twin pregnancies.

Birth Weight