PubMed · 1349956
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M J Metcalfe, G Lip, F G Dunn. 1992-05-16. Dipyridamole.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(92)91166-6
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The micellization behavior of a diblock copolymer comprising a highly hydrophilic and biocompatible poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) (PMPC) corona-forming block and a pH-sensitive poly(2-(diisopropylamino)ethyl methacrylate) (PDPA) core-forming block (PMPC-b-PDPA) has been studied by static and dynamic light scattering (SDLS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and potentiometry. Self-assembly of PMPC-b-PDPA copolymers with two different DPA volume fractions (phi(DPA)) leads to narrowly distributed and structurally distinct spherical micelles, as evidenced by their molecular weight (M(w,mic)), aggregation number (N(agg)), hydrodynamic radius (R(H)), corona width (W), and core radius (R(c)). The excellent potential of these pH-responsive micelles as nanosized drug delivery vehicles was illustrated by the encapsulation of dipyridamole (DIP), a model hydrophobic drug that dissolves in acid solutions and becomes insoluble above pH 5.8, which is comparable to the pK(a) of the PDPA block. The influence of micelle structure (namely M(w,mic), N(agg), R(H), W, and R(c)) on drug loading content, drug loading efficiency, partition coefficient, and release kinetics was investigated and confirmed by fluorescence spectroscopy studies. The maximum dipyridamole loadings within PMPC(30)-b-PDPA(30) (R(H) = 14.0 nm; W = 4.8 nm; R(c) = 9.2 nm) and PMPC(30)-b-PDPA(60) (R(H) = 27.1 nm; W = 11.0 nm; R(c) = 16.1 nm) micelles were 7 and 12% w/w(p), respectively. This preferential solubilization of DIP into micelles formed by copolymer chains having longer core-forming blocks (i.e., possessing larger core volumes) reflects the larger partition coefficient (K(V)) of DIP between the aqueous phase and PMPC(30)-b-PDPA(60) micelles (K(V) = 5.7 x 10(4)) compared to PMPC(30)-b-PDPA(30) micelles (K(V) = 1.1 x 10(4)). This enhanced ability of PMPC(30)-b-PDPA(60) aggregates to entrap/stabilize small hydrophobic molecules also produces slower release kinetics. Rapid release can be triggered by lowering the pH to induce micellar dissociation.
Enzymatic oxidation of dipyridamole (DIP) by horseradish peroxidase-hydrogen peroxide system (HRP-H2O2) in aqueous and micellar solutions was carried out. The reaction was monitored by optical absorption and fluorescence techniques. In aqueous solution at pH 7.0 and pH 9.0, the disappearance of the characteristic bands of DIP centered at 400 nm and 280 nm was observed. A new strong band at 260 nm is observed for the oxidation product(s) with shoulders at 322 nm and 390 nm. A non-fluorescent product is formed upon oxidation. In cationic cethyl trimethyl-1-ammonium chloride (CTAC) and zwitterionic 3-(N-hexadecyl-N,N-dimethylammonium) propane sulfonate (HPS) micellar solutions the same results are observed: three, well-defined, isosbestic points in the optical spectra suggest the transformation between two species. In anionic micellar sodium dodecylsulfate solution (SDS), the appearance of a new band centered around 506 nm was observed, associated to a solution color change from the usual yellow to deep blue/violet, characteristic of a radical species associated to the one-electron oxidation of DIP to its cation radical (DIP*+), observed previously in electrochemical oxidation. Experiments of radical decay kinetics monitoring the absorbance change at 506 nm were performed and analyzed in the frame of a kinetic model taking into account the species both in homogeneous and micellar media. The reaction medium is composed of bulk solution, SDS micelle/solution interface and enzyme catalytic site(s). The variation of DIP*+ concentration was analyzed assuming: (1) synthesis of DIP*+ by HRP through one-electron oxidation; (2) decomposition of DIP*+ by further one-electron oxidation; (3) direct two-electron oxidation of DIP by HRP; (4) bimolecular DIP*+ disproportionation. The main results of the analysis are as follows: (1) kinetic data can be divided in two phases, an HRP active phase and another phase which proceeds in the absence of enzyme activity due to consumption of all H2O2; (2) the reactions of DIP*+ formation, DIP*+ decomposition and DIP two-electron oxidation are HRP concentration dependent; (3) since DIP*+ formation constant seems to be overestimated, it is proposed that two-electron oxidation is another source of DIP*+, through the comproportionation reaction. Evidences for this reaction were also observed previously in electrochemical experiments; and (4) the kinetic analysis provides evidences that the bimolecular reaction of DIP*+ takes place mainly in the absence of active HRP and in this phase the combination of, at least, two second-order kinetic processes is needed to model the experimental data. Our data suggest that HRP oxidizes DIP in general by a two-electron process or that the cation radical is very unstable so that the one-electron process is only detected in the presence of anionic surfactant, which stabilizes significantly the DIP*+ intermediate.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.