PubMed · 13616934
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C REICH. 1958. A simplified method for bone marrow transfusions.. https://doi.org/10.1159/000205506
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic decisions in cancer are generally guided by molecular biomarkers or, for some newer therapeutics, primary tumor genotype. However, because biomarkers or genotypes may change as new metastases emerge, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from blood are being investigated for a role in guiding real-time drug selection during disease progression, expecting that CTCs will comprehensively represent the full spectrum of genomic changes in metastases. However, information is limited regarding mutational heterogeneity among CTCs and metastases in breast cancer as discerned by single cell analysis. The presence of disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in bone marrow also carry prognostic significance in breast cancer, but with variability between CTC and DTC detection. Here we analyze a series of single tumor cells, CTCs, and DTCs for PIK3CA mutations and report CTC and corresponding metastatic genotypes. METHODS: We used the MagSweeper, an immunomagnetic separation device, to capture live single tumor cells from breast cancer patients' primary and metastatic tissues, blood, and bone marrow. Single cells were screened for mutations in exons 9 and 20 of the PIK3CA gene. Captured DTCs grown in cell culture were also sequenced for PIK3CA mutations. RESULTS: Among 242 individual tumor cells isolated from 17 patients and tested for mutations, 48 mutated tumor cells were identified in three patients. Single cell analyses revealed mutational heterogeneity among CTCs and tumor cells in tissues. In a patient followed serially, there was mutational discordance between CTCs, DTCs, and metastases, and among CTCs isolated at different time points. DTCs from this patient propagated in vitro contained a PIK3CA mutation, which was maintained despite morphological changes during 21 days of cell culture. CONCLUSIONS: Single cell analysis of CTCs can demonstrate genotypic heterogeneity, changes over time, and discordance from DTCs and distant metastases. We present a cautionary case showing that CTCs from any single blood draw do not always reflect metastatic genotype, and that CTC and DTC analyses may provide independent clinical information. Isolated DTCs remain viable and can be propagated in culture while maintaining their original mutational status, potentially serving as a future resource for investigating new drug therapies.
Cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, which are mediated by cell adhesion molecules, play a fundamental role during many cellular processes including growth, differentiation, cell migration and cancer metastasis. One molecule playing a major role in these processes is the CD44 surface receptor, which is expressed in a wide range of cells including many cells of the hemopoietic system, where it mediates the interaction with its major ligand, hyaluronate. However, little is known about CD44 and hyaluronate in bone marrow and this was investigated immunohistochemically in trephine biopsies and in cultivated human bone marrow stromal cells. In biopsy specimens, patches of hyaluronate deposition were detected in the extracellular matrix (ECM). However, most of the areas of the ECM were devoid of hyaluronate. Single mast cells and lymphocytes scattered throughout the marrow were CD44 immunopositive. Marrow-derived stromal cells (MDSC) expanded in cell culture were immunopositive for CD44, hyaluronate synthase, and hyaluronate. Hence, a marked difference between CD44 immunolocalisation and hyaluronate deposition can be observed between in situ and under cell culture conditions. Since in normal marrow in situ the number of CD44 immunopositive cells was low, interactions of CD44 and hyaluronate would appear to not to play a major role in cell adhesion in the normal bone marrow.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a sensitive tool for examining all the structures involved in the osteoarthritis (OA) process. While much of the MRI literature previously focussed on cartilage, there is increasing research on whole-organ evaluation and including features such as synovitis, bone marrow edema, and meniscal and ligamentous pathology. The aim of this session at the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT)-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Workshop for Consensus in Osteoarthritis Imaging was to describe the current MRI methods for identifying and quantifying non-cartilaginous structures and review their associations with both OA symptoms and structural progression. Although there is much experience in measuring synovitis (derived from the rheumatoid arthritis literature), only one study has reported an association of MRI-detected synovitis and effusions with OA pain. Bone marrow edema lesions, which may represent areas of trabecular remodelling, have been associated with pain and compartment-specific structural deterioration. MRI studies have confirmed the frequency and importance of meniscal damage in progressive cartilage loss, but not related such damage to symptoms. Osteophytes have been associated with cartilage loss and malalignment to the side of the osteophyte. Ligament damage, including anterior cruciate ligament tears, has been found more commonly than expected in painful OA knees. Improvements in quantitative and semi-quantitative assessments of non-cartilage features will greatly assist understanding of the OA process and its response to therapy.