PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 13630364

[Rectal drip instillation].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

1959-01-10. [Rectal drip instillation].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13630364/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

No volume effect on retrograde colonic spread of rectally-administered ropivacaine gel.

BACKGROUND: Rectal administration of enemas, foams and suppositories is the most efficient way to deliver locally acting drugs to the distal colon. Ropivacaine, a long-acting local anaesthetic, was chosen as a candidate for a new rectal treatment of ulcerative colitis. AIM: To determine the colonic spread of a rectal ropivacaine formulation. METHODS: In this randomized, incomplete cross-over study, 12 male volunteers were given 200 mg ropivacaine HCl rectally in 20, 40, 60 and 80 mL hydroxypropyl methylcellulose gel. The viscosity of the gel was 1.1 Pa s. The spread of the radiolabelled (99mTc-labelled diethylenetriaminepenta-acetic acid) formulations was assessed by gamma-scintigraphy. Plasma was collected and analysed for ropivacaine base. RESULTS: The retrograde spread was limited to the descending colon and the difference between the studied volumes was not statistically significant. Only the 80-mL volume tended to have a larger distribution, although the 20-mL volume showed the same maximal distribution in two subjects. No distinct relationship between volume, retrograde colonic spread and plasma concentrations could be found. Ropivacaine was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal ropivacaine gel in all volumes between 20 and 80 mL can spread up to the descending colon. There was no relationship between either retrograde colonic spread or the administered volume and the ropivacaine plasma concentrations.

Administration, Rectal↗

Ethanol-induced colitis prevents oral tolerance induction in mice.

The gut mucosa is a major site of contact with antigens from food and microbiota. Usually, these daily contacts with natural antigens do not result in inflammatory reactions; instead they result in a state of systemic hyporesponsiveness named oral tolerance. Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are associated with the breakdown of the immunoregulatory mechanisms that maintain oral tolerance. Several animal models of IBD/colitis are available. In mice, these include targeted disruptions of the genes encoding cytokines, T cell subsets or signaling proteins. Colitis can also be induced by intrarectal administration of chemical substances such as 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid in 50% ethanol. We report here a novel model of colitis induced by intrarectal administration of 50% ethanol alone. Ethanol-treated mice develop an inflammatory reaction in the colon characterized by an intense inflammatory infiltrate in the mucosa and submucosa of the large intestine. They also present up-regulation of both interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) and interleukin-4 (IL-4) production by cecal lymph node and splenic cells. These results suggest a mixed type of inflammation as the substrate of the colitis. Interestingly, cells from mesenteric lymph nodes of ethanol-treated mice present an increase in IFN-gamma production and a decrease in IL-4 production indicating that the cytokine balance is altered throughout the gut mucosa. Moreover, induction of oral tolerance to ovalbumin is abolished in these animals, strongly suggesting that ethanol-induced colitis interferes with immunoregulatory mechanisms in the intestinal mucosa. This novel model of colitis resembles human IBD. It is easy to reproduce and may help us to understand the mechanisms involved in IBD pathogenesis.

Administration, Rectal↗

Proteinase-activated receptor-2-induced colonic inflammation in mice: possible involvement of afferent neurons, nitric oxide, and paracellular permeability.

Activation of colonic proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) provokes colonic inflammation and increases mucosal permeability in mice. The mechanism of inflammation is under debate and could be neurogenic and/or the consequence of tight-junction opening with passage of exogenous pathogens into the lamina propria. The present study aimed to further characterize the inflammatory effect of PAR-2 activation by investigating: 1) the role of NO, 2) the role of afferent neurons, and 3) a possible cause and effect relationship between colonic paracellular permeability changes and mucosal inflammation. Thus, intracolonic infusion to mice of the PAR-2-activating peptide, SLIGRL, increased both myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity and damage scores indicating colonic inflammation, and enhanced colonic permeability to (51)Cr-EDTA from 2 to 4 h after its infusion. NO synthase inhibitors, L-NAME and aminoguanidine, as well as the neurotoxin capsaicin and NK1, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists, SR140333 and CGRP(8-37), prevented SLIGRL-induced MPO and damage score increases and permeability. In contrast, although the tight-junction blocker, 2,4,6-triaminopyrimidine, and the myosin L chain kinase inhibitor, ML-7, prevented SLIGRL-induced increase in permeability, they did not prevent MPO and damage score increases. Taken together our data show that both NO and capsaicin-sensitive afferent neurons are involved in PAR-2-mediated colonic inflammation and paracellular permeability increase. Nevertheless, the inflammation process is not a consequence of increased permeability which results at least in part from the activation of myosin L chain kinase.

Administration, Rectal↗