PubMed · 13685226
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
E AUTIO, P VIRTAMA. 1960. [Electromyography].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13685226/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the frequency and severity of disorders of sleep and wake and their relation to the quality of life (QoL) in patients who have survived an episode of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: In a prospectively collected, consecutive series of 89 patients, 83 patients completed validated and frequently used questionnaires for the assessment of disorders of sleep and wake (SDL and Epworth Sleepiness Score) at least 1 year (range, 1 to 3.4 years) after the SAH. We used the modified Rankin scale for functional outcome and Short Form 36 (SF-36) to assess QoL. We related the occurrence of severe problems with sleep (insomnia or excessive daytime sleepiness score or both > or =3 on SDL) to functional outcome and to the QoL scores and compared the latter scores with data from a Dutch reference population. In a subset of 20 patients with severe problems with sleep, we performed polysomnographic and actigraphic studies at home during 48 hours. RESULTS: Twenty eight (34%) patients had severe problems with sleep. Frequently reported problems are initiating (25%) or maintaining (31%) sleep, difficulty returning (28%) asleep, tiredness (31%), and excessive sleepiness during the day (6%). QoL was considerably reduced in patients with severe problems with sleep. During the sleep monitoring studies, severe sleep fragmentation, sleep apnea, restless legs syndrome/periodic limb movement disorder, or a combination of these disorders of sleep and wake occurred in 19 of 20 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients who have survived an episode of SAH have disorders of sleep and wake, which are related to the QoL.
OBJECTIVE: To find the theoretically smallest subsets of muscles for needle-electromyography screening of cervical radiculopathies that meet or exceed the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AAEM) guideline: ascertaining that each root and its adjacent roots are represented by at least 2 muscles each, innervated by those roots via different peripheral nerves. DESIGN: Twenty-two and 36 muscle sets and their myotomal innervation were derived from the literature, and rearranged into 15 and 23 unique muscle groups by root and peripheral nerve innervation. All 2 circumflex 15 and 2 circumflex 23 subsets thereof were respectively identified. The best approximations that met or exceeded the AAEM criteria were computed for each subset and the smallest subsets that qualified were retained. SETTING: Electromyography laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: None. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Compliance with or exceeding the AAEM guideline in the number of muscles sampled per damaged root and the number of muscles sampled per adjacent normal roots. RESULTS: The smallest subsets satisfying or exceeding the AAEM guideline are of 8, 9, and 10 muscles each, and are enumerated in tables 3 and 4 in this article. CONCLUSIONS: Electromyographers may choose a set or sets from tables in this article that best suits them, with confidence that they comply with or exceed the AAEM guideline while causing minimal pain to their patients and using the shortest possible procedure. All the roots can be screened at once to best differentiate between normal and damaged roots, and, in most cases, to reach a final diagnosis. Nonetheless, when needed, each set may be the basis for a more extensive workup.
A large number of examinees referred to electromyographic (EMG) laboratories do not have symptoms or signs suggestive of a peripheral nervous system disorder, and the aim of the present study was to check this. All examinees evaluated by the author in a "general" EMG laboratory in the first 4 months of 2002 were included. Data on examinees, referral physicians and diagnoses, clinical symptoms and signs, and electrodiagnostic findings were statistically evaluated. Three hundred examinees, 42% men, were included. A neurological diagnosis was provided in 55% of referrals. Electrodiagnostic abnormalities were found in 45% of examinees. Using multivariate statistics, a positive effect of neurological referral diagnosis, history of paraesthesias and of weakness and sensory loss on examination, and a negative effect of history of pain on pathological electrodiagnostic findings were found. Except 20 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, no patient with normal clinical examination had abnormal electrodiagnostic findings. Our study confirmed the inappropriateness of referrals to electrodiagnostic examination to screen patients for peripheral nervous disorders. We propose electrodiagnostic examination mainly of patients with unequivocal clinical signs of a peripheral nervous system lesion and of patients with typical symptoms of the carpal tunnel syndrome.