Multiple myeloma.

D A Winfield

PubMed · 1371082

Multiple myeloma.

Abstract

Patients with multiple myeloma may present with insidious or acute clinical problems to wide variety of medical specialties. It is important for doctors to know how to diagnose myeloma accurately, to be aware of the clinical complications and to have some knowledge of the newer therapeutic approaches to chemotherapy and supportive treatment.

Explore related subjects

Bone Marrow Examination Bone Marrow Transplantation Diagnosis, Differential Humans Interferons Melphalan Multiple Myeloma Prognosis Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

D A Winfield. Multiple myeloma.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1371082/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

Comparison of the DNA content of megakaryocytes identified immunologically with that identified morphologically.

We devised a new microfluorometric method for determining the ploidy of megakaryocytes identified immunologically in bone marrow smears. The smears were immunostained by incubation with mouse monoclonal anti-glycoproteins (GP) IIb antibodies, followed by fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat antimouse IgG antibodies. They were then stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Megakaryocytes were identified by their GPIIb immunofluorescence using a microfluorometer and, after the filters were changed, their DNA content was assayed by measuring the intensity of DAPI fluorescence. This intensity was shown to be proportional to the DNA content when the aperture of the objective lens was reduced. We compared these results with those obtained when megakaryocytes were identified morphologically, using DAPI staining after Wright-Giemsa destaining. In all 12 normal controls, the ploidy peaks were shown to be 16N by both methods, and the mean ploidy detected by the immunological method was only reduced 0.961 times relative to the estimate from the morphological method. In contrast, in eight myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients, the ploidy peaks were either 8N or 4N and the mean was reduced by 0.906 times (P = 0.018). Thus we could immunologically identify small megakaryocytes which we could not identify morphologically. Therefore, this method is useful for measuring megakaryocytic ploidy, especially in the pathological megakaryocytes of MDS patients.

Bone Marrow Examination↗

PubMed1997

[Myelodysplastic syndromes: diagnosis from bone biopsy is reliable but requires a close collaboration between the anatomo-pathologist and the clinician. a good knowledge of differential diagnosis and of clinical pictures which can mimic myelodysplasia].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Bone Marrow Examination↗

PubMed1996

Assessment of IgH PCR strategies in multiple myeloma.

AIMS: To compare the ability of four commonly used PCR techniques to demonstrate clonal IgH rearrangements in multiple myeloma. METHODS: Bone marrow samples (containing a minimum of 10% plasma cells) were obtained from 127 patients with confirmed multiple myeloma. Framework 3 (Fr3) PCR was performed in all cases and the Framework 1 (Fr1f) PCR, which utilises six VH family specific primers, in 98 cases. In addition, 44 cases were assessed by Fr3, Fr1f, Framework 2 (Fr2) and Framework 1 consensus (Fr1 con) PCR techniques. JH primer selection was also assessed such that each PCR strategy was performed twice in each of the 44 cases, using the JH consensus primer (JH con) alone and then repeated with an equimolar mixture of JH con, JH3 and JH6 (JH mix). RESULTS: Clonal rearrangements were demonstrated in 71 (56%) of 127 cases with the Fr3 PCR and in 52 (53%) of 98 with the Fr1f PCR. However, by using both techniques it was possible to demonstrate clonal IgH rearrangements in 92 (75%) of 122 cases. Forty four cases were assessed by all four PCR techniques; in these cases the Fr3 and Fr1f PCRs demonstrated clonal rearrangements in 26 (59%) cases with a combined yield of 34 (77%). The Fr2 and Fr1 con PCR techniques had inferior pick up rates, demonstrating clonal rearrangements in 21 (48%) of 44 cases and a combined yield of 28 (63%). The Fr2 PCR did, however, demonstrate a clonal rearrangement in one case negative by both Fr3 and Fr1f. Two additional rearrangements were demonstrated by using JH mix; one became positive by Fr3, Fr1f and Fr2 and the other positive by Fr1f, Fr1 con and Fr2. CONCLUSIONS: By utilising both the Fr3 and Fr1f PCR techniques it is possible to demonstrate definitive clonal rearrangements in the majority of patients with multiple myeloma. The Fr1 con and Fr2 PCR techniques have inferior pick up rates but may detect some additional rearrangements.

Bone Marrow Examination↗