PubMed · 13724364
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C C DREVETS, P M SEEBOHM. Dermatitis from alcohol.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8707(61)90095-8
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Premix alcohol products (also known as ready-to-drink beverages) are a rapidly expanding alcohol category and frequently marketed using 'better for you' claims (e.g., 'Low sugar', 'Natural'). Little is known about the extent to which these products are ultra-processed or whether marketing claims align with ultra-processed status. This study aimed to address this evidence gap by auditing ingredient disclosure on premix products, assessing the ultra-processed status of these products, and determining the prevalence of 'better for you' claims with a particular focus on claims relating to ultra-processed status. METHODS: 534 premix alcohol products sold in major Australian retail outlets were assessed. Products were evaluated for compliance with mandatory ingredient disclosure, classified according to ultra-processed status based on the presence of indicators of ultra-processing (additives and other industrial ingredients), and analysed to determine the prevalence and types of 'better for you' marketing claims. RESULTS: Only 79% of assessed products displayed an ingredients list. Among compliant products, 98% contained at least one additive or ingredient indicative of ultra-processing, most commonly flavours, carbonating agents, colours, and sweeteners. One-third (33%) of products containing an ultra-processing indicator displayed a claim suggesting naturalness or minimal processing. Substantially higher proportions of ultra-processed products than non-ultra-processed products carried health-related claims. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Premix beverages available in Australia are overwhelmingly ultra-processed, yet many are marketed in ways that may mislead consumers about their composition and healthfulness. Stronger regulatory oversight of ingredient disclosure and marketing claims in this sector is urgently needed to support informed consumer decision-making.
The effect of chitosan on Saccharomyces cerevisiae (the yeast that carries out alcohol fermentation), Brettanomyces bruxellensis and Brettanomyces intermedius (contaminants of alcohol fermentations), was investigated. The effect of chitosan was tested on each yeast, as well as on mixed cultivations of S. cerevisiae + B. bruxellensis and S. cerevisiae + B. intermedius. Chitosan enhanced the lag period of both strains of Brettanomyces (80 h for B. bruxellensis and 170 h for B. intermedius with 6 and 2 g/l chitosan, respectively). The growth rate of S. cerevisiae was inversely proportional to the chitosan concentration; the former was 50% when 6 g/l polysaccharide was used. Moreover, in mixed cultivations of S. cerevisiae and Brettanomyces strains, it was found that both B. bruxellensis and B. intermedius failed to grow while growth of S. cerevisiae was not affected (using 3 and 6 g/l chitosan, respectively). An interesting collateral result was that the presence of chitosan accelerated the consumption of glucose in the mixed cultivations (60 h instead of 120 h).
A new counterion-buffered molybdate electrolyte was developed and optimized for simultaneous quantitative determination of up to eight anions (chloride, sulphate, oxalate, fluoride, formate, malonate, succinate, and acetate) in Bayer liquor by capillary electrophoresis with indirect detection at 214 nm. The separation parameters were optimized in respect to separation of the critical analyte group fluoride-formate-malonate, with the optimal electrolyte prepared from molybdic trioxide containing 5.0 mmol/L MoO3, 1.3 mmol/L cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), and buffered with diethanolamine (DEA) to pH 9.2 (ca. 20 mM DEA). Total length of separation capillary was 80 cm, resulting in run time of under 4 min. The method is suitable for a wide concentration range of the analytes (1-50 mg/L) with linear calibration plots (R2 = 0.9983-0.9999). Relative standard deviations were 0.05%-0.07% for migration times and 0.67%-2.04% for peak areas. The detection limits were in the range of 0.17-0.51 mg/L or 2-10 micromol/L (hydrostatic injection of 30 s of 1000 x diluted sample). Due to its good buffering capacity, the electrolyte exhibited an excellent ruggedness and good tolerance to the alkaline samples. Consequently, Bayer liquor samples could be diluted as little as 100 x which allows more sensitive determination of minor components over previous methods. The method was successfully applied to analysis of Bayer liquor samples with recoveries in the range of 95-105%.