PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1374554

Reverse transcriptase inhibits Taq polymerase activity.

L N Sellner·R J Coelen·J S Mackenzie
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Detection of viral RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) requires the prior reverse transcription of the viral RNA. In order to minimise the number of manual manipulations required for processing large numbers of samples, we attempted to design a system whereby all the reagents required for both reverse transcription and amplification can be added to one tube and a single, non-interrupted thermal cycling program performed. Whilst attempting to set up such a one-tube system with Taq polymerase (Taq; Biotech International) and avian myoblastosis virus (AMV) reverse transcriptase (RT), we noticed a substantial decrease in the sensitivity of detection of viral RNA. Investigation of this phenomenon has revealed direct interference of RT with Taq polymerase. Evidence supporting this conclusion includes the following observations: (1) increasing the ratio of Taq to RT improves sensitivity; (2) adding non-homologous RNA improves sensitivity; (3) RT that has been heat inactivated prior to Taq addition does not exert this effect; (4) the effect is not sequence restricted; (5) the Mg2+ ions are not sequestered by RT. In addition, the effect is not limited to AMV RT, Moloney murine leukaemia virus RT also affects Taq activity.

Explore related subjects

Avian Myeloblastosis VirusBase SequenceGene AmplificationMagnesiumMolecular Sequence DataMoloney murine leukemia virusNucleic Acid Synthesis InhibitorsPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralRNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseSensitivity and SpecificityTaq PolymeraseTemperatureJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L N Sellner, R J Coelen, J S Mackenzie. 1992-04-11. Reverse transcriptase inhibits Taq polymerase activity.. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar%2F20.7.1487

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

A new method for measuring reverse transcriptase activity by ELISA.

A new and sensitive assay of reverse transcriptase (RT) activity of retroviruses measures the incorporation of digoxigenin-labelled dUTP in newly synthesized DNA instead of radioactively labelled (3H- or 32P-)dTTP. To avoid difficulties associated with separation of non-incorporated nucleotides from the newly synthesized DNA, biotin-labelled dUTP is added to the reaction mixture in very low concentrations. After reverse transcription, the newly synthesized, doubly labelled DNA is immobilized on streptavidin-coated ELISA wells and evaluated photometrically by binding of peroxidase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin-antibodies (sheep) and subsequent colour development with 2,2'-azino-di[3-ethylbenzthiazolin-sulfonate(6)] (ABTSR) as substrate. For better standardization, it is suggested that RT activity is given in units (one unit of RT is the amount of enzyme incorporating one nanomole of labelled dNTP in 10 min at 37 degrees C into an acid precipitable DNA) rather than in cpm (counts per minute). The method is specific and easy to perform.

Avian Myeloblastosis Virus↗
PubMed1992

Temperature-dependent template switching during in vitro cDNA synthesis by the AMV-reverse transcriptase.

Reverse transcriptase template switching has been invoked to explain several aspects of retroviral replication and recombination, and has been reported in vitro for the Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MuLV) reverse transcriptase. During in vitro cDNA synthesis, the avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV) reverse transcriptase can switch from one template to another in a homology-dependent and temperature-dependent manner. Chimeric cDNA molecules are generated within 30 min at high incubation temperatures, with an increasing efficiency from 42 degrees C to 50 degrees C. Such products are detectable only after much longer incubation times when primer extension reactions are carried out at lower temperatures (90 min at 37 degrees C).

Avian Myeloblastosis Virus↗
PubMed1992

Unequal human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase error rates with RNA and DNA templates.

Sequence variation in the type 1 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) results, in part, from inaccurate replication by reverse transcriptase. Although this enzyme is error-prone during synthesis in vitro with DNA templates, the fidelity of RNA-dependent DNA synthesis relevant to minus-strand replication in the virus life cycle has not been examined extensively. In the present study, we have developed a system to determine the fidelity of transcription and reverse transcription and have used it to compare the fidelity of DNA synthesis by the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase with RNA and DNA templates of the same sequence. Overall, fidelity was several-fold higher with RNA than with DNA. Sequence analysis of mutants generated with the two substrates revealed that differences in error rates were substantial for specific errors. Fidelity with RNA was greater than 10-fold higher for substitution and minus-one nucleotide errors at five different homopolymeric positions. Because such errors likely result from template-primer slippage, this result suggests that misaligned intermediates are formed and/or used less frequently with an RNA template-DNA primer than with a DNA template-DNA primer. The results also suggest that HIV-1 reverse transcriptase synthesis with an RNA template-DNA primer was error-prone during incorporation of the first two nucleotides, perhaps due to aberrant enzyme-substrate interactions as synthesis initiates. The unequal error rates with RNA and DNA templates suggest that mistakes during minus- and plus-strand DNA synthesis may not contribute equally to the mutation rate of HIV-1. The data also provide estimates of substitution and frameshift error rates during transcription by T7 RNA polymerase.

Avian Myeloblastosis Virus↗