PubMed · 13753769
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
P J KOZINN, C L TASCHDJIAN. 1961. Candidiasis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13753769/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
To determine the need and appropriate timing of catheter removal in patients with candidemia, the records for 404 patients with cancer and central venous catheters (CVCs) who developed candidemia during the period of 1993-1998 were retrospectively reviewed. Of the total 404 cases of candidemia, 241 (60%) were due to a primary source, 111 (27%) were catheter related, and 52 (13%) were secondary cases of candidemia caused by a source other than the catheter. Multivariate analysis showed that catheter removal < or =72 h after onset improved response to antifungal therapy exclusively in patients with catheter-related candidemia (P=.04). Clinical characteristics that suggested a noncatheter source for the candidemia were disseminated infection (P<.01), previous chemotherapy (P<.01), previous corticosteroid therapy (P=.02), and poor response to antifungal therapy (P<.03). CVC removal < or =72 h after onset should be considered in patients with suspected catheter-related candidemia who have no evidence of dissemination, recent corticosteroid therapy, or chemotherapy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) is a major complication for patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HTPN). Endoluminal sampling techniques allow the diagnosis of CRBSI without catheter removal and may allow the screening of asymptomatic patients. METHODS: Over a 5-year period, patients receiving HTPN were offered screening on a 3 monthly basis. All patients had tunnelled cuffed Hickman lines. All were asymptomatic at the time of screening, which took the form of either endoluminal brushing or quantitative cultures on through-line blood. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were suitable for inclusion within the study period (10 male, median age 51 (iqr 46-61)) years with 30 of these having a least one screening performed. Four had positive screening results and underwent appropriate treatment. Of the remainder, 12 presented with at least one clinical episode of CRBSI and 14 had neither clinical CRBSI nor a positive screening result. The combined clinical and screening CRBSI rate was 0.39 episodes per catheter year. CONCLUSION: Although routine microbiological catheter screening can detect subclinical infections in HTPN patients the positive rate is low with the majority of patients still presenting clinical. Identification of higher risk patients and appropriate alterations to screening frequency may improve its value further.