PubMed · 13763049
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
L LOEB. 1960. Anorexia nervosa.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-196011000-00010
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
It is suggested that the symptoms of anorexia nervosa are physiological responses to starvation. There is no evidence of a neural or non-neural dysfunction that predisposes women for anorexia nervosa and the endocrine and psychological consequences of starvation are reversed once patients have re-learnt how to eat and regained a normal body weight. Because variability in the supply of food may be a common evolutionary condition, it is more likely that body weight is variable than constant in normal circumstances. The role of the neuroendocrine system in times of feast and famine is to allow the individual to adopt behavioral strategies as needed rather than maintaining body weight homeostasis. Treatment of anorexic patients should aim at reducing their high level of physical activity in order to facilitate eating.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a critical literature review of studies assessing the prevalence of mood disorders (MD) in subjects with eating disorders (ED; anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa). In the first part of this article, we discuss methodological issues relevant to comorbidity studies between ED and MD. In the second part, we summarize the findings of these studies in light of the methodological considerations raised. METHOD: A manual computerised search (Medline) was performed for all published studies on comorbidity between ED and MD. In order to have sufficiently homogeneous diagnostic criteria for both categories of disorders, this search was limited to articles published between 1985 and 2006. RESULTS: Too few studies include control groups, few studies compared diagnostic subgroups of ED subjects, and results are scarce or conflicting. DISCUSSION: The results are discussed in the light of the methodological problems observed. The implications when reviewing the results of published studies and planning future research are set out.