PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1376669

Rapid stream stimulation and the recognition potential.

Abstract

The "recognition potential" is an electrical response of the brain that occurs for recognizable, but not for non-recognizable, images. When a recognizable image evokes it, the more rostral of a pair of vertically oriented occipital electrodes reaches an initial positive peak at about 200-250 msec. Several properties distinguish this component of the evoked response from event-related potentials such as N2 or P3. A new method of stimulation was devised that evoked the recognition potential for recognizable images, but virtually no response of any kind for non-recognizable images. This was accomplished by presenting images at high rates. Chinese ideographs evoked it for subjects whose native language was Chinese, but not for subjects unfamiliar with that language. This showed that the recognition potential was not caused by differences in the physical attributes of the images per se. Instead, recognizability, as defined by a subject's individual learning experience, was the important factor.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A P Rudell. 1992. Rapid stream stimulation and the recognition potential.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(92)90135-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Four-dimensional sonographic assessment of fetal facial expression early in the third trimester.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the characteristic patterns of facial expression in fetuses aged from 28 to 34 weeks using 4-dimensional (4-D) ultrasonography. METHODS: The faces of 10 healthy fetuses aged from 28 to 34 weeks were recorded continuously for 15 min with a 4-D ultrasonographic machine performing up to 25 frames per second. The occurrence rates of blinking, mouthing, yawning, tongue expulsion, smiling, scowling, and sucking were evaluated. RESULTS: Mouthing was the most frequent facial expression (median, 6.5; range, 2-19) whereas the least frequent were scowling (median, 1; range, 0-9) and sucking (median, 1; range, 0-2). Mouthing was evident in all fetuses and significantly more frequent than any other movement (P<.05). Yawning (median, 3; range, 0-6), smiling (median, 2; range, 0-9), and blinking (median, 1.5; range, 0-6) were observed in most cases. Tongue expulsion (median, 1.5; range, 0-5), scowling, and sucking were each observed in 6 cases. CONCLUSION: 4-D sonography provides a means of evaluating fetal facial expression early in the third trimester. It may be a key to predicting fetal brain function and well-being and an important modality in future fetal neurophysiologic research.

Blinking↗

Motor system inhibition in dopa-responsive dystonia and its modulation by treatment.

Dopa-responsive dystonia (DRD) causes dystonia-parkinsonism, which is abolished by levodopa. The authors assessed short intracortical inhibition and facilitation, silent period, blink reflex recovery cycle, and reciprocal inhibition in seven patients with DRD on and off treatment. Short intracortical inhibition and blink reflex recovery cycle were reduced, but increased with treatment. Silent period was normal on and off treatment. Third phase of reciprocal inhibition was reduced on and off treatment. A discrete pattern of motor inhibitory dysfunction occurs in DRD.

Blinking↗