PubMed · 13770862
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M H MILLER, J RENDALL, M KALMON. 1961. Bone-conduction changes following audiosurgery.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13770862/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
We present a case study of a 49-year-old patient with an 8-year history of hypersensitivity to sound produced by intrinsic but not extrinsic sources. Findings that indicated an organic problem were: a supranormal bone conduction threshold of -25 to -15 dB HL from 0.25 to 1 kHz with an air-bone gap of 15 to 45 dB HL, a lower threshold and larger amplitude for vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials, eye movement reactions to sound and trunk pitch sway in response to sound. Results of immitance audiometry and otoacoustic emission testing were within normal limits and indicative of intact middle ear conductance. A high-resolution CT scan of the temporal bone demonstrated a dehiscence of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal. These findings support previous research indicating that auditory energy reaches the cochleo-vestibular receptor systems more easily via transmission through cerebrospinal fluid than through bone. Therefore, a dehiscence of the bone overlying the superior semicircular canal may lead to hypersensitivity to intrinsic sound. We recommend that similar findings in other patients be followed up with an evaluation of middle ear function and the temporal bone with high-resolution CT scan.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of a bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) Softband (fitted unilaterally and bilaterally) in young children with bilateral congenital aural atresia. SUBJECTS: Two children with severe bilateral congenital conductive hearing loss, who had been fitted with a transcutaneous BAHA Softband at the age of 3 and 28 months, respectively. The latter child had been fitted with a conventional bone-conduction hearing aid at the age of 3 months; at 28 months, this child had received the BAHA Softband and after 5 months of unilateral application, the BAHA Softband was fitted bilaterally. Follow-up in the two children was 31 and 17 months, respectively. METHODS: Using the artificial mastoid, gain and maximum output were studied in this new transcutaneous application of the BAHA, with the BAHA Classic and the BAHA Compact as sound processor. Results were compared to those obtained with a conventional bone-conduction device (Oticon E 300 P). Aided thresholds and sound lateralization scores were assessed with double visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA). To test the validity of the BAHA Softband, the speech and language development of the children was assessed by means of age-appropriate tests (the preverbal Symbolic play test and the Dutch non-speech test for receptive and expressive language and the Dutch version of the Reynell language test). RESULTS: The electro-acoustic measurements showed minor differences in gain between the three devices. At a reduced volume setting, the mean input level at which the output levelled off was largely comparable between the BAHA Classic and the conventional device, but somewhat poorer with the BAHA Compact. Both children showed speech and language development that was in accordance with their cognitive development. CONCLUSIONS: The BAHA Softband was a valid intervention in children with congenital bilateral aural atresia who were too young for percutaneous BAHA application.