PubMed · 13789214
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
S R JAIN, G C SEPAHA. 1961. Exercise tolerance test in constrictive pericarditis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13789214/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Evidence-based recommendations on the clinical use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in lung and heart disease are presented, with reference to the assessment of exercise intolerance, prognostic assessment and the evaluation of therapeutic interventions (e.g. drugs, supplemental oxygen, exercise training). A commonly used grading system for recommendations in evidence-based guidelines was applied, with the grade of recommendation ranging from A, the highest, to D, the lowest. For symptom-limited incremental exercise, CPET indices, such as peak O(2) uptake (V'O(2)), V'O(2) at lactate threshold, the slope of the ventilation-CO(2) output relationship and the presence of arterial O(2) desaturation, have all been shown to have power in prognostic evaluation. In addition, for assessment of interventions, the tolerable duration of symptom-limited high-intensity constant-load exercise often provides greater sensitivity to discriminate change than the classical incremental test. Field-testing paradigms (e.g. timed and shuttle walking tests) also prove valuable. In turn, these considerations allow the resolution of practical questions that often confront the clinician, such as: 1) "When should an evaluation of exercise intolerance be sought?"; 2) "Which particular form of test should be asked for?"; and 3) "What cluster of variables should be selected when evaluating prognosis for a particular disease or the effect of a particular intervention?"
BACKGROUND: B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are both increasingly used in the clinical management of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Unfortunately, there is very limited data regarding the association between BNP and LVEF. METHODS: BNP and LVEF were measured in 260 consecutive patients with suspected myocardial ischemia referred for rest/ergometry myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The correlation between BNP and LVEF was studied using Spearman's correlation test. RESULTS: Median LVEF was 57% (IQR, 50 to 64), and median BNP level was 53 pg/ml (IQR, 24 to 109). LVEF and BNP levels showed a statistically significant, but overall weak correlation (r=0.274, p<0.001). The correlation seemed to depend on the presence of a myocardial scar, which was detected in 104 patients (40%), including 89 men (49% of men) and 15 women (20% of women). The correlation between BNP and LVEF was moderate in patients with a myocardial scar (r=-0.540, p<0.001), but very weak in patients without a scar (r=0.185, p=0.025). Moreover, the correlation between BNP and LVEF was moderate in men (r=-0.503, p<0.001), but not existent at all in women. In the overall cohort, BNP was not an accurate test to detect left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The area under the ROC curve was 0.643 (95% CI, 0.563-0.723). CONCLUSIONS: The BNP level and LVEF show only a weak correlation in patients with suspected myocardial ischemia. Neurohormonal and morphologic assessments provide different windows to the heart.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of backward walking treadmill training for restoration of motor function, balance and walking speed in patients with stroke. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with stroke, 17 males and 9 females, aged 36 - 64, with the lower extremity Brunnstrom motor recovery stage at 3 or 4, able to walk for 10 m without walking aid or orthosis, were randomly divided into two equal groups: The patients in the control group were to participate in a 60-minutes conventional training five times a week for three weeks, and the patients in the experimental group received 30-minute conventional training and then 30-minute backward walking training five times a week for three weeks. Before the training and 3 weeks after the training, Fugl-Meyer assessment was used to assess the motor function of the lower extremity (FMA-L), Berg balance scale (BBS) was used to assess the balance function, and 10 m maximum walking speed was measured. RESULTS: After the three-week training period, the FMA-L score of the experimental group was 28.0 +/- 3.3, significantly higher than that of the control group (25.5 +/- 2.3, P = 0.033); the BBS score of the experimental group was 51.4 +/- 1.8, significantly higher than that of the control group (47.3 +/- 3.7, P = 0.001, and 10 m MWS of the experimental group was 57 +/- 17, significantly higher than that of the control group (43 +/- 16, P = 0.034). CONCLUSION: A safe and feasible intervention, additional backward walking therapy helps improve the damaged motor function, balance, and walking speed of the patients with stroke.