PubMed · 13931260
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
G LOEBELL. 1963. [Ceruminoma].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13931260/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Ear candles are hollow tubes coated in wax which are inserted into patients' ears and then lit at the far end. The procedure is used as a complementary therapy for a wide range of conditions. A critical assessment of the evidence shows that its mode of action is implausible and demonstrably wrong. There are no data to suggest that it is effective for any condition. Furthermore, ear candles have been associated with ear injuries. The inescapable conclusion is that ear candles do more harm than good. Their use should be discouraged.
Numerous factors may be involved in the development of chronic recurrent otitis externa: altered pH of the cerumen, increased susceptibility to contact allergens (e.g. nickel ear-rings) in atopic patients, the use of instruments for cleaning out the auditory canal, the presence of a foreign body, congential narowing of the auditory canal, or systemic diseases (in particular diabetes mellitus). For diagnostic purposes, the use of the otoscope is mandatory, and swabs to determine the presence of bacteria or fungi are to be recommended. Treatment is dictated by the clinical picture presenting, and may comprise the local application of antibiotic cortisone containing or antimycotic preparations and temponade of the auditory canal (acute inflammatory phase) or pH-stabilizing lotions (chronic dry inflammatory phase) with the aim of ameliorating the frequently highly troublesome pruritus.