PubMed · 13939095
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J NOVAK. 1963-04-28. [Sprained ribs].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13939095/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Arthritis self-management programs (ASMPs) are integrated into many clinical practice guidelines and policies, and are the core business of Arthritis Foundations. Australian Arthritis Foundations are embarking on a National Quality Assurance Program which should raise awareness and improve confidence in such programs. ASMPs aim to empower people, improve quality of life while living with chronic disease, increase healthy activities and improve self-monitoring - each of which can assist with clinical management, but can be difficult to evaluate. Although there is modest high-quality evidence of traditional "clinical outcomes" from ASMPs, these programs are strongly endorsed by consumers, are being used as a vehicle for healthcare reform, and have the potential to substantially improve public health. Coordinated national delivery of patient education programs has the potential to improve healthcare and outcomes for people with arthritis.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the self-administered Quality of Well-Being (QWB-SA) Scale for patients with rheumatic diseases. METHODS: Family medicine patients (n = 562) and rheumatology patients (n = 334) were assessed using the following tools: QWB-SA, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS), and Rapid Assessment of Disease Activity in Rheumatology (RADAR). RESULTS: Patients with arthritis had significantly lower QWB-SA scores and significantly higher HAQ scores than family medicine patients with and without adjustment for covariates. The QWB-SA was significantly associated with quartiles from the RADAR, AIMS, and HAQ, providing evidence for the validity of the generic measure in patients with arthritis. Discriminant function analysis was used to create an arthritis-specific scoring system for the QWB-SA. Analyses demonstrated systematic relationships between the Quality of Well-Being arthritis composite and the disease-specific RADAR, AIMS, and HAQ. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence supports the validity of the QWB-SA for patients with rheumatic diseases. QWB-SA items can be used to calculate an arthritis-specific score. The QWB-SA can be used to gain generic information for cost-utility analysis and disease-specific outcomes information for patients with arthritis.