PubMed · 13954422
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M D HIGHTOWER, D L KESTER, B BRINKLEY, J MOORE. Grip sander.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13954422/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: To compare make and break techniques for hand-held dynamometry in persons with tetraplegia. We compared the interrater and intrarater reliability, the relative forces, and variability between examiner techniques. DESIGN: Two examiners with no previous hand-held dynamometry training performed hand-held dynamometry on the elbow flexors or extensors of 19 persons with upper limb weakness secondary to tetraplegia, using break and make techniques. Testing was performed in two sessions separated by 10 mins. Simultaneous recording from an electrogoniometer placed across the elbow was obtained for a subset of participants. RESULTS: Break and make techniques both showed intraclass correlation coefficients exceeding 0.9 for interrater and intrarater reliability. The maximum expected difference for 95% of repeated measurements was 3.5 kg, with hand-held dynamometry strength values that averaged 7-11 kg. Average break/make ratios ranged from 1.38 +/- 0.29 to 1.49 +/- 0.37. The electrogoniometric data showed that the two examiners used similar testing technique, and small variations in technique were not associated with significant differences in strength recordings. CONCLUSION: Make and break techniques for hand-held dynamometry both show high reliability over a short intersession period when performed by inexperienced examiners on weak elbow flexors and extensors.
It is generally considered that physical fitness is affected by daily life activities including leisure time activity and working time activity. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different levels of physical activity at work on physical fitness, analyze the effects of 12-week lifestyle modification outside of working hours on physical fitness, work satisfaction and subjective symptoms, and to consider the role of lifestyle modification in occupational health. Lifestyle modification, consisting of aerobic exercise and diet counseling, was conducted for 12 weeks. The data before and after the intervention from 49 male workers were obtained. Physical fitness such as exercise endurance, flexibility, agility, balance, muscular strength, muscular endurance, and muscular power was measured before and after the intervention. The subjects were asked to fill out questionnaires about their work activities, subjective complaints, and work satisfaction. Subjects were divided into active work group (n = 14) and sedentary work group (n = 35) for analysis according to their work activities. As for differences in physical fitness due to different levels of physical activity, the active work group had superior exercise endurance and balance compared to the sedentary work group. In addition, the sedentary work group tended to experience greater fatigue than the active work group. In the active work group, flexibility and muscular strength were significantly increased with lifestyle modification and, in the sedentary work group, exercise endurance, flexibility and muscular endurance were significantly improved while balance also showed a tendency to improve. In the sedentary work group, lifestyle modification resulted in reduced fatigue and stiff neck as well as an increased work satisfaction. In the active work group, no change was observed in complaints or work satisfaction, but improved physical fitness led to a reduction in subjective complaints and an increase in work satisfaction. The level of physical activity at work contributes to the physical fitness of the worker and the addition of aerobic exercise in the worker's leisure time improves physical fitness and thereby contributes to increased work ability regardless of differences in the level of physical activity at work.
STUDY DESIGN: A clinical convenience sample of workers with low back problems was tested once for a variety of parameters. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the links between lumbar range of motion and scores obtained from functional evaluation tests. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although lumbar range of motion traditionally has been the standard used to determine disability for the purposes of compensation, a concern arises from the fact that a discrete physical impairment associated with low back pain and diminished range of motion often is never found. METHODS: This study involved 18 workers with chronic low back pain referred to a rehabilitation center for determination of compensation and fitness for return to work. Lumbar range of motion was precisely and accurately measured with a three-dimensional lumbar motion instrument. In addition, typical functional tests were performed for each patient. Comparisons were made between all the lumbar range of motion values and each of the functional ability scores. RESULTS: The most notable finding was the lack of significant correlation between most of the lumbar range of motion values and the functional test scores. Only 9 of a possible 144 correlations were significant. CONCLUSIONS: The relation between lumbar range of motion measures and functional ability is weak or nonexistent. This has implications for clinical practice as it relates to disability determination for patients with chronic low back pain, and perhaps for the current impairment guidelines of the American Medical Association.