PubMed · 13974491
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
H N ROBSON. 1962. Human chromosomal abnormalities.. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.1962.11.4.281
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
14q32 translocations [t(14q)] represent critical but not universal events in multiple myeloma (MM). Gains of chromosome arms 1q, 9q, and 11q (+1q, +9q, and +11q) have recently been identified as frequent aberrations in this disease, but their pathogenetic significance remains unclear. We studied a series of 108 MM patients using fluorescence in situ hybridization and DNA probes mapping to chromosome bands 1q21, 9q34, 11q25, 13q14, and 14q32. Three subsets of tumors were defined: (1) MM+/+ (detection of +9q and +11q; 43.5% of cases), (2) MM+/- (+9q or +11q; 21.3%), and (3) MM-/- (neither +9q nor +11q; 35.2%). The incidence of t(14q) was significantly different in these subgroups: 23% in MM+/+, 56% in MM+/-, and 89% in MM-/-. Deletion of 13q (13q-) also was significantly less frequent in MM+/+ (23%) than in MM+/- and MM-/- (36% and 63%, respectively). The nonrandom distribution of chromosomal aberrations in the present series of MM tumors points to a novel, 14q32 translocation-independent pathogenetic pathway in plasma cell neoplasms.
Molecular methods can complement the classical methods in pathology like macroscopic, histological and immunohistochemical examinations.Comparative genomic hybridization is a cytogenetic method to screen for gains and losses of chromosomal material in tumor cells. This method allows defect studies of archival paraffin-embedded and formalin-fixed tumor material. CGH can detect gains and losses of chromosomal material that are at least 10 to 20 megabases in size. This genome-wide screening method allows to study the cytogenetic relationship between differently located tumors of a patient. To answer the question if these different tumors are metastases of the primary lung tumor or independent primary tumors CGH analysis is a supplementary method that introduces new prospectives.
There are no guidelines available for diagnostic studies in patients with mental retardation (MR) established in an evidence-based manner. Here we report such study, based on information from original studies on the results with respect to detected significant anomalies (yield) of six major diagnostic investigations, and evaluate whether the yield differs depending on setting, MR severity, and gender. Results for cytogenetic studies showed the mean yield of chromosome aberrations in classical cytogenetics to be 9.5% (variation: 5.4% in school populations to 13.3% in institute populations; 4.1% in borderline-mild MR to 13.3% in moderate-profound MR; more frequent structural anomalies in females). The median yield of subtelomeric studies was 4.4% (also showing female predominance). For fragile X screening, yields were 5.4% (cytogenetic studies) and 2.0% (molecular studies) (higher yield in moderate-profound MR; checklist use useful). In metabolic investigations, the mean yield of all studies was 1.0% (results depending on neonatal screening programmes; in individual populations higher yield for specific metabolic disorders). Studies on neurological examination all showed a high yield (mean 42.9%; irrespective of setting, degree of MR, and gender). The yield of neuroimaging studies for abnormalities was 30.0% (higher yield if performed on an indicated basis) and the yield for finding a diagnosis based on neuroradiological studies only was 1.3% (no data available on value of negative findings). A very high yield was found for dysmorphologic examination (variation 39-81%). The data from this review allow conclusions for most types of diagnostic investigations in MR patients. Recommendations for further studies are provided.