PubMed · 14003161
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
S ZAMENHOF. 1963. Mutations.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(63)90102-5
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
A unified type of response experiment is suggested for complex systems made up of individual species (atoms, molecules, quasi-particles, biological organisms, etc.). We make the following assumptions: (i) some of the species may exist in two forms, labeled and unlabeled, respectively; (ii) the kinetic and transport properties of the labeled and unlabeled species are the same, respectively (neutrality assumption); (iii) the experiment preserves the total input and output fluxes; only the fractions of the labeled compounds in the input and output fluxes are varied. Under these circumstances a linear integral superposition law connects the fractions of labeled species in the input and output fluxes. This linear superposition law is valid for homogeneous and inhomogeneous systems and for systems with intrinsic (hidden) state variables; it arises from the neutrality condition and holds even though the underlying dynamics of the process may be highly nonlinear. Because this response law does not involve the linearization of the evolution equations it has great potential for the analysis of complex physical, chemical, and biological systems. We compare our approach with the linearization techniques used in biochemistry and genetics. We consider a simple reaction network involving replication, transformation, and disappearance steps and study the influence of experimental (measurement) and linearization errors on the evaluated values of rate coefficients. We show that the method involving the linearization of the kinetic equations leads to unpredictable results; because of the interference between measurement and linearization errors, either error compensation or error amplification occurs. Although our approach does not eliminate the effects of measurement errors, it leads to more consistent results. For a broad range of input fractions no error amplification or compensation occurs, and the error range for the rate coefficients is about the same as the error range of the measurements.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In the institutional sense of the term "discipline" (laboratories, societies, congresses, curricula, etc.), genetics remains a discipline. In the intellectual sense of the term (consensus on a definite array of concepts, methods and theoretical purposes), it is doubtful that genetics is still a discipline. At first, molecular biology seemed to have introduced an unequivocal structural (or molecular) definition of the gene: a definite sequence of nucleotides that code for a protein. In fact, as it appears in retrospect, this was not the case. Even in 1961, when Jacob and Monod proposed their first model of genetic regulation in bacteria, there was no possibility of constructing a non equivocal concept of the gene. More recent developments in molecular genetics have made this situation worse. There is no possible definition of the gene as a general category. The reasons why biologists keep the word are pragmatic rather than theoretical: communication among scientists, economic interests and ideology.