PubMed · 14017707
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
K M CAHILL. 1963-08-01. Amebiasis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14017707/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The differentiation of the two Entamoeba species E. histolytica and E. dispar through molecular characterization in the last decade of the twentieth century led to the need to re-evaluate the epidemiology of amebiasis in terms of prevalence and morbidity of the infection in the world's population, particularly in those geographic regions with high endemic rates.
The use of in vivo animal models in amebiasis has contributed significantly to the knowledge of this common human parasitic disease. Although there is no animal model that mimics the whole cycle of the human disease, the use of different susceptible and resistant laboratory animals and the availability for many years of techniques for the axenic culture of trophozoites of Entamoeba histolytica have allowed a better understanding of the parasite and the host-parasite relationship. The recent introduction of frontier methodologies in biology has increased our comprehension of this parasite. New information on the cellular and molecular biology and genetics of this organism has been extensively reported, and much of this has clearly required the more frequent use of animal models to verify specific facts. Based on experimental animals characterized previously, the introduction of new animal models with genetic or surgical modifications, especially in mice, has allowed a more adequate analysis of the mechanisms of pathogenesis. Multiple factors have been considered in the promotion of the invasiveness and virulence of E. histolytica. Additionally, the immunological and physiological responses of the host, depending on the environmental conditions, lead to the establishment or the rejection of the parasite. The role of inflammatory reaction to amebic infection constitutes one of the controversies that has been studied by several authors. In susceptible animals (hamsters and gerbils), inflammatory cell damage seems to be related to target cell lysis, while in resistant animals (mice), inflammatory cells appear to protect the host by lysing the parasite. Presently, the involvement of various substances in the development of lesions including lectins, proteases, amebapores, promoters of apoptosis, cytokines, nitric oxide, etc., is being examined using different in vivo models.
Hué, a city of about 300,000 inhabitants in Central Vietnam, is known as a "hot spot" for diseases caused by Entamoeba histolytica and in particular for amebic liver abscess (ALA), thus representing an excellent site for studies on the epidemiology and treatment of E. histolytica infections. Accordingly, during the last few years, various studies on this topic have been performed in Hué in close collaboration among the Hué Medical College, the Hué Central Hospital and the Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany. These studies comprised (i) comprehensive analyses of a considerably large number of ALA cases, (ii) parasitological and seroepidemiological surveys on the prevalence and outcome of E. histolytica infections as well as (iii) comparative randomized treatment trials in order to optimize the therapeutic regimen for ALA and for asymptomatic E. histolytica infection.