PubMed · 14019093
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
D L CASPAR, R DULBECCO, A KLUG, A LWOFF, M G STOKER, P TOURNIER, P WILDY. 1962. Proposals.. https://doi.org/10.1101/sqb.1962.027.001.007
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Advances in T cell biology have revealed heterogeneity among T cell populations that is not captured by existing general nomenclature. This issue has caused an ad hoc broadening of core T cell subset definitions and the invention of new subset designations that have not been uniformly delineated. To address this issue, in this Consensus Statement, we propose guidelines that serve three goals. First, they advocate that primary research reports define the experimental basis by which relevant subsets are designated in the methods section of each study. Second, they provide standardized definitions for existing subset designations in popular use, and common experimental criteria for defining each subset are noted. Last, they present an alternative 'modular nomenclature' paradigm. The newly proposed modular nomenclature eschews conceptualization of antigen-experienced T cells as belonging to a few idealized subsets, and the nomenclature instead simply indicates individual biological properties present in a T cell population with brief descriptors. Collectively, these guidelines intend to enhance transparency in the literature while facilitating clearer communication of findings and concepts to researchers, students and clinicians.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Official nutrition committee reports in both North America and Europe now state that Vitamin D is more of a hormone than a nutrient. These statements are wrong, and do not reflect the definitions of either vitamin or hormone. Researchers often compound the problem by referring to calcitriol or other deltanoids as "Vitamin D". These things have serious consequences: (1) The literature is burdened by an ongoing confusion that presumes that the reader will somehow "know" what the writer refers to by "Vitamin D". (2) Medical practitioners not familiar with the ambiguities administer Vitamin D inappropriately when calcitriol or a deltanoid analog would be correct, or vice versa. (3) Attempts to promote Vitamin D nutrition are hindered by alarmist responses justifiably associated with the widespread administration of any hormone. Vitamin D is a vitamin in the truest sense of the word, because "insufficient amounts in the diet may cause deficiency diseases". The term, prohormone, is not relevant to the Vitamin D system, but 25-hydroxy-Vitamin D (calcidiol) is appropriately described as a prehormone, i.e. a glandular secretory product, having little or no inherent biologic potency, that is converted peripherally to an active hormone.