PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14023622

A developmental study of sequential two-choice decision making.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G J CRAIG, J L MYERS. 1963. A developmental study of sequential two-choice decision making.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1963.tb05153.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effect of behavioral history on subsequent responding: experiments using rotary fixed-ratio schedules.

The present study proposes a novel experimental approach to examine the effect of previous schedule history on subsequent responses. College students used a three-button device to indicate their choice of response. We performed two experiments. Each experiment consisted of three phases. In experiment I, fixed-ratio 10 (FR 10) reinforcement schedule was employed in phases 1 and 3. Phase 2 employed "Rotary-FR 10" schedule: after obtaining a point produced by pressing one of three specified buttons in a triangular array 10 times, the effective button changed to another in a clockwise direction. Optimal response pattern for Rotary-FR 10 was analyzed. Two types of behavior, referred to as "consecutive" and "scatter" were observed in phase 1. The mean number of optimal responses in consecutive type was significantly higher than scatter type in phases 2 and 3. In experiment II, two schedules were used in phase 1, and the same protocol used in experiment I was followed. We found that the reinforcement schedule used in phase 1 affected acquisition of the optimal response in phase 2. These results suggest that the earlier behavioral tendencies play an important role in determining subsequent behavior and that such behavioral tendency can be modified by specifically designed protocols.

Choice Behavior↗

Increasing patient choice in primary care: the management of minor ailments.

We examine the effects of an intervention to provide easier access to pharmacists for patients with minor ailments. The intervention allowed pharmacists to prescribe and dispense medicines currently limited to general practitioners (GPs) without patients losing their right to free prescriptions. We show that the total number of GP consultations was unaffected by the intervention but that the proportion which were for minor ailments decreased. We also use estimate multinomial models of patient choices between GP and pharmacies and find that the main determinant is the type of minor ailment. Distance appears to have no effect on patient choice.

Choice Behavior↗