PubMed · 14139484
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J P MASSIN. 1964. [GYNECOMASTIA. PATHOGENIC PROBLEMS AND PRACTICAL PROBLEMS].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14139484/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Contradictory results are available regarding prediction of testicular sperm extraction in 47,XXY patients. This study, therefore, aimed at assessing the availability of testicular sperm and evaluates clinical parameters predicting successful sperm retrieval in azoospermic 47,XXY Klinefelter's syndrome patients. METHODS: Sperm recovery procedures were performed in 50 non-mosaic azoospermic Klinefelter patients. The facial hair pattern and the presence of gynaecomastia in men with successful and unsuccessful sperm recovery were compared using Fisher's exact test. The predictive value of clinical parameters such as age, testicular volume, FSH, FSH:LH ratio, testosterone and androgen sensitivity index (LH x testosterone) for successful testicular sperm retrieval was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: In 24 patients (48%) testicular sperm were recovered. Ninety-four per cent of the men in whom sperm was found had a normal facial hair pattern compared to 93% in whom no sperm was recovered (not significant, NS). Seventeen percent of the men with successful testicular sperm extraction had gynaecomastia compared to 31% of the men with failed testicular sperm extraction (NS). The mean testicular volume of the largest testis in patients with sperm found was 4.2 ml compared to 3.6 ml in patients with no sperm found (NS). The mean FSH and testosterone values in patients with sperm recovered were 31.2 IU/l and 3.1 ng/ml versus 40.4 IU/l (P = 0.04) and 3.2 ng/ml (NS) in patients without sperm recovered. All examined clinical and biological parameters failed to predict the outcome of the testicular sperm extraction using ROC curve analysis. CONCLUSION: As in the general population of men with non-obstructive azoospermia, there are currently no clinical parameters predicting successful sperm retrieval in the subpopulation of patients with non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome.
It is now well accepted that low grades of gynecomastia are best treated with liposuction alone. However, the surgical management of the high-grade gynecomastia (Simon's grade III) has remained problematic because both liposuction and conventional subcutaneous mastectomy (without skin excision) have frequently resulted in significant residual skin redundancy, requiring a second operation for skin resection. Our preferred approach to high-grade gynecomastia has been the single-stage subcutaneous mastectomy and circumareolar concentric skin reduction with deepithelialization. However, in the rare case of tubular breast deformity in the male and also in patients with gynecomastia who underwent massive weight loss, simple mastectomy and free nipple graft is performed. Therefore, these 2 groups of patients will be excluded from the current series. Twenty-four consecutive males with high-grade gynecomastia were reviewed. All patients underwent subcutaneous mastectomy with concentric skin resection. There were no major complications such as infection, hematoma, seroma, or nipple-areola complex necrosis. The main disadvantage of the technique was the mild residual skin redundancy, which was noted in all 24 patients. This redundancy, however, was never severe enough to require a secondary procedure, and all patients were satisfied with the final result.
Gynecomastia is common, being present in 30% to 50% of healthy men. A general medical history and careful physical examination with particular attention to features suggestive of breast cancer often suffice for evaluation in patients without symptoms or those with incidentally discovered breast enlargement. Men with recent-onset gynecomastia or mastodynia need a more detailed evaluation, including selected laboratory tests to search for an underlying cause. Treatment depends on the cause and may include observation, withdrawal of an offending drug, therapy of an underlying disease, giving androgen or antiestrogen drugs, or plastic surgery.