PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1416160

ST segment depression during labor and delivery.

Abstract

ECG changes suggestive of myocardial ischemia are common during cesarean delivery under regional anesthesia. To determine the time course, duration, and significance of these ECG changes, we monitored 111 parturients with continuous ambulatory ECG (Holter) during and after cesarean delivery. Twenty-two parturients undergoing vaginal delivery were similarly monitored. ST segment depression was present in 25% of patients undergoing cesarean delivery but was not found in those patients delivering vaginally. ST segment elevation was not detected in either group. The incidence of ST segment depression during cesarean delivery was similar with epidural (29%), spinal (17%), and general (18%) anesthesia, occurring most commonly in the 30 min following delivery (P less than 0.001). Transthoracic echocardiographic imaging was performed in 23 patients undergoing cesarean section. Five of the 23 patients had seven episodes of intraoperative ST segment depression. Regional wall motion abnormalities were not present in any patient. A decrease in ejection fraction area greater than 15% from baseline or from previous interval ejection fraction area was present during four episodes of ST change. Three episodes of ST depression were not associated with significant decreases in ejection fraction area. Precordial Doppler monitoring for detection of venous air embolism in 25 patients revealed no association between the occurrence of venous air embolism and ST segment depression. We conclude that although significant myocardial impairment during cesarean delivery does not occur, episodes of ST depression may not all be merely an artifact of parturition.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J P Mathew, L A Fleisher, J A Rinehouse, F B Sevarino, R S Sinatra, A H Nelson, E K Prokop, S H Rosenbaum. 1992. ST segment depression during labor and delivery.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199210000-00004

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section.

BACKGROUND: Regional and general anaesthesia (GA) are commonly used for caesarean section (CS) and both have advantages and disadvantages. It is important to clarify what type of anaesthesia is more efficacious. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of regional anaesthesia (RA) with those of GA on the outcomes of CS. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 December 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2005, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to December 2005), and EMBASE (1980 to December 2005). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of RA and GA in women who had CS for any indication. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, data extraction and trial quality. MAIN RESULTS: Sixteen studies (1586 women) were included in this review. Women who had either epidural anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia were found to have a significantly lower difference between pre and postoperative haematocrit (weighted mean difference (WMD) 1.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47 to 2.93, one trial, 231 women) and (WMD 3.10, 95% CI 1.73 to 4.47, one trial, 209 women). Compared to GA, women having either an epidural anaesthesia or spinal had a lower estimated maternal blood loss (WMD -126.98 millilitres, 95% CI -225.06 to -28.90, two trials, 256 women) and (WMD -84.79 millilitres, 95% CI -126.96 to -42.63, two trials, 279 women). More women preferred to have GA for subsequent procedures when compared with epidural (odds ratio (OR) 0.56, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.96, one trial, 223 women) or spinal (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.81, 221 women). The incidence of nausea was also less for this group of women compared with epidural (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.64 to 6.14, three trials, 286 women) or spinal (OR 23.22, 95% CI 8.69 to 62.03, 209 women). No significant difference was seen in terms of neonatal Apgar scores of six or less and of four or less at one and five minutes and need for neonatal resuscitation with oxygen. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence from this review to show that RA is superior to GA in terms of major maternal or neonatal outcomes. Further research to evaluate neonatal morbidity and maternal outcomes, such as satisfaction with technique, will be useful.

Anesthesia, Conduction↗

[Perineal regional anaesthesia: indications in gynaecologic and proctologic surgery and in obstetric].

Perineal and proctologic surgery is well known as very painful. The apparition of new specific needles, long acting and less toxic local anaesthetics and neurostimulation allowed reconsidering some old forgotten techniques. Those blocks appear really useful to optimize multimodal postoperative analgesia and postoperative rehabilitation. After anatomic review, authors describe perineal regional anaesthesia and discuss about main indications and advantages, in the eyes of their experience and bibliographic review.

Anesthesia, Conduction↗