PubMed · 14190855
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J F GOODWIN. 1964. OBSTRUCTIVE CARDIOMYOPATHY: CLINICAL FEATURES.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14190855/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Low-flow states are associated with adverse outcomes in aortic stenosis (AS), but the prognostic value of transvalvular flow rate (TFR) has not been consistently established across studies. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies (published by November 14, 2025) comparing low versus normal TFR in AS. Data were collected from Kaplan-Meier curves. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Survival was assessed using pooled Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox regression, flexible parametric survival models, and restricted mean survival time (RMST) analysis. A total of 9 studies including 6,494 patients were analyzed; 2,575 (39.7%) had low TFR. At 8 years of follow-up, estimated survival was 34.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.7% to 47%) in the low-TFR group and 63% (95% CI 58.9% to 67.4%) in the normal-TFR group. Low TFR was associated with higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.59, 95% CI 1.45 to 1.74, p < 0.001). We observed a progressively greater hazard over time, with the hazard ratio approaching 1.9 by 8 years. At 8 years, RMST in the normal-TFR group was 7.37 years (95% CI 7.21 to 7.53 years) versus 5.07 years (95% CI 4.91 to 5.23 years) in the low-TFR group, representing a lifetime loss of 2.3 years in the low-TFR group (ΔRMST -2.30 years, 95% CI -2.53 to -2.07 years, p < 0.001). In patients with AS, low TFR is associated with significantly higher mortality and lifetime loss. These findings support TFR as a clinically meaningful marker for risk stratification in AS.
In patients with aortic stenosis, the left ventricular afterload is determined by the degree of valvular obstruction and the systemic arterial system. We developed an explicit mathematical model formulated with a limited number of independent parameters that describes the interaction among the left ventricle, an aortic stenosis, and the arterial system. This ventricular-valvular-vascular (V(3)) model consists of the combination of the time-varying elastance model for the left ventricle, the instantaneous transvalvular pressure-flow relationship for the aortic valve, and the three-element windkessel representation of the vascular system. The objective of this study was to validate the V(3) model by using pressure-volume loop data obtained in six patients with severe aortic stenosis before and after aortic valve replacement. There was very good agreement between the estimated and the measured left ventricular and aortic pressure waveforms. The total relative error between estimated and measured pressures was on average (standard deviation) 7.5% (SD 2.3) and the equation of the corresponding regression line was y = 0.99x - 2.36 with a coefficient of determination r(2) = 0.98. There was also very good agreement between estimated and measured stroke volumes (y = 1.03x + 2.2, r(2) = 0.96, SEE = 2.8 ml). Hence, this mathematical V(3) model can be used to describe the hemodynamic interaction among the left ventricle, the aortic valve, and the systemic arterial system.
The authors describe the results of intra-operative hemodynamic monitoring during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and with significant aortic stenosis. The results in the groups composed of 13 and 12 patients were compared with the findings in 10 young, non-obese, non-smokers without significant cardiovascular history and with normal findings during resting transthoracic echocardiography. Monitoring itself was conducted using transesophageal echocardiography 1) after the induction of anesthesia, 2) after the induction of capnoperitoneum, and 3) after setting the operative anti-Trendelenburg position. The measurements were performed at least in triplicate and the results were processed using ANOVA test. Significant differences were identified in the time course patterns of heart rate, mean arterial pressure, dual product (pressure-rate-product), and cardiac output. In terms of pathophysiology, we believe that the most important achievement was the identification of different time course patterns of individual parameters in the respective groups. The results in the group of patients with aortic stenosis were based particularly on the different time course of the mean arterial pressure, while the results in patients with ischemic disease were more dependent on the time course of the heart rate. Very interesting is a drop of peripheral vascular resistance after positioning of these patients which could be explained only partially by a beta-blocking or ACEI medication. In clinical terms, the most important finding was probably that no complications occurred in the entire group of 35 patients, of which 25 suffered from severe organic cardiopathies.