PubMed · 14211971
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R B TALLARICO, R N MAISEL. 1964. PREFERENCES AMONG GEOMETRIC FORMS.. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872086400600208
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Our experience using the "Superextended" facelifting technique in 3580 female patients is presented herein. The technique is based on extended subcutaneous facial and neck skin undermining, extensive superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) dissection with low lateral freeing of the edges of the platysma muscle. The trimmed SMAS is fixed to the adjacent tissues, enabling the upward and lateral pulling effect of the facial structures. The neck contour is rebuilt by lateral pulling and fixing of the dissected lateral platysmal edges, along the entire neck, and meticulous supraplatysmal fat sculpturing. The skin is redraped over the newly built SMAS and platysmal skeleton, trimmed, and sutured without any tension. The concept of beauty in the eyes of the surgeon is expressed by adding other ancillary procedures during or shortly after the main procedure. Subcutaneous forehead lift using the hairline incision was performed in 70% of the female patients, concomitantly with the face-lifting procedure. Upper and lower blepharoplasties, chin implant, perioral dermabrasion, rhinoplasty, and fat grafting have been performed according to the surgeon's judgment and the patient's request. The objectives of an ideal facial surgery, which are youthful, natural, dynamic, attractive, feminine, and long-lasting results, can be achieved using this technique. Lack of major complications and an overall minor complications rate of only 4.4% makes this technique safe, reproducible, and reliable. This is one of the largest presented series of this procedure, performed by 1 surgeon. The presented cases demonstrate the results obtained using this technique.
In the measurement of outcome, rhinoplasty surgery suffers from the lack of easily calculable data such as recurrence rates or survival figures, which are inherent in other branches of the speciality and surgical practice in general. We have reviewed methods utilized for the assessment of outcome following aesthetic rhinoplasty, and have developed an instrument by which a pre- and postoperative assessment of nasal and facial appearance can be made from standard frontal, lateral, basal and oblique photographs, the Rhinoplasty Assessment Scale (Photographic) (RASP). It is our intention that this will act as a template for methodical and standardized photographic assessment of the nose prior to rhinoplasty. This will highlight the changes required and provide a quantitative measure of nasal aesthetics, which will be complimentary to existing measures of subjective patient benefit.
There are distinctive anatomical differences between the non-Caucasian (platyrrhine, mesorrhine) nose and the Caucasian (leptorrhine) nose. In general, non-Caucasian patients requesting aesthetic rhinoplasty desire improvement and refinement of their noses with preservation of defining ethnic characteristics. Surgeons who perform rhinoplasty in this patient population must be familiar with the variations in nasal anatomy and implement augmentation rather than reduction techniques to achieve the desired aesthetic and functional outcomes. We provide a brief review of recent historical trends in ethnic rhinoplasty, highlight relevant anatomical differences, and describe our strategy for addressing the challenges of ethnic rhinoplasty.