PubMed · 14241014
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
K KREMER. OUR EXPERIENCE ON RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14241014/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Late stent malapposition (LSM) is only detected if intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is performed at implantation and follow-up. We used a novel "regional" IVUS analysis to assess the mechanism of LSM. METHODS AND RESULTS: Corresponding image slices on postimplantation and follow-up IVUS studies of 11 malapposed stents were identified and electronically rotated until they were aligned. The geometric center of the stent was identified, and the angle of late malapposition measured. Radii were drawn from this center through the transition points between complete apposition and LSM. These two circumferences were divided into equal arcs, and radii were drawn to the external elastic membrane (EEM). Measurements included EEM radius and circumference, plaque and media (P&M=EEM minus stent radius) thickness and area, and stent-intima separation. Mean baseline EEM radius and P&M thickness were similar in apposed and malapposed circumferences. At follow-up, mean EEM radius increase within the malapposed circumference (0.57+/-0.34 mm) was larger than within the apposed circumference (0.16+/-0.18 mm; P=0.0004). DeltaEEM for each malapposed radius was greater than for each apposed radius (P<0.05 for all comparisons). Stent-intima separation correlated with EEM radius increase within the malapposed circumference (r=0.83, P=0.0013). At follow-up, the mean P&M thickness decreased in the malapposed circumference (-0.31+/-0.22 mm; P<0.0001). However, the decrease in P&M thickness in the malapposed circumference occurred because the same P&M area was distributed over a larger circumference (4.1+/-1.6 mm to 5.4+/-3.0 mm; P=0.05), the result of positive remodeling. CONCLUSIONS: The main cause of LSM is a regional increase in EEM (regional positive remodeling).
The efficacy and safety of coronary stent implantation depend on the mechanical features of these devices when deployed in atheromatous lesions of various morphologies. We evaluated the trackability, flexibility, and conformability of 17 coronary stents using specific mechanical bench tests. The quantifications used a dynamometer for assessment of trackability (maximal strength) and flexibility (stiffness) and a 3D optical gauging machine for assessment of conformability (distance between stent and arterial wall in a curvature). The maximal strength (measuring the trackability) ranged respectively from 0.24 +/- 0.06 and 0.38 +/- 0.03 N (Seaquest) to 1.31 +/- 0.42 and 1.34 +/- 0.35 N (Carbostent), concerning respectively curvatures of 90 degrees (P < 0.0001) and 135 degrees (P < 0.0001). The stiffness (measuring the flexibility) ranged from 0.53 +/- 0.16 (Seaquest) to 1.28 +/- 0.10 N/mm (NIR Royal; P < 0.0001). The mean distance between stent and external curvature (external conformability) ranged from 0.15 +/- 0.06 mm (S7) to 0.57 +/- 0.4 mm (NIR Royal; P < 0.0001). The mean distance between stent and internal curve (internal conformability) ranged from 0.26 +/- 0.13 (S7) to 0.44 +/- 0.12 mm (S670; P < 0.0001). These results may influence the choice of a particular stent adapted to a specific coronary anatomy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.