PubMed · 14289573
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J E CARR. 1965. COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY: CONDUCT DESCRIPTIVE TERMS VS COGNITIVE PROCESS.. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1965.16.1.133
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
We present for mental processes the program of mathematical mapping which has been successfully realized for physical processes. We emphasize that our project is not about mathematical simulation of the brain's functioning as a complex physical system, i.e., mapping of physical and chemical processes in the brain on mathematical spaces. The project is about mapping of purely mental processes on mathematical spaces. We present various arguments--philosophic, mathematical, information, and neurophysiological--in favor of the p-adic model of mental space. p-adic spaces have structures of hierarchic trees and in our model such a tree hierarchy is considered as an image of neuronal hierarchy. Hierarchic neural pathways are considered as fundamental units of information processing. As neural pathways can go through the whole body, the mental space is produced by the whole neural system. Finally, we develop the probabilistic neural pathway model in that mental states are represented by probability distributions on mental space.
This paper discusses the relationship between culture and intelligence. The main message of the paper is that intelligence cannot fully or even meaningfully be understood outside its cultural context. Behaviour that is considered intelligent in one culture may be considered unintelligent in another culture, and vice versa. Moreover, people in different cultures have different implicit (folk) theories of intelligence, so may not even mean the same thing by the word. The relationships between different aspects of intelligence can vary across cultures, with correlations that are positive in one setting proving to be negative in another. The paper opens with a general discussion of issues regarding the relationship between the two concepts. It then describes the theory of successful intelligence, which motivates our work on the interface between culture and intelligence. Finally, the article draws some conclusions.
The paper by Meyer-Lindenberg and colleagues in this issue of Neuron provides strong evidence that the absence of one or more genes in Williams syndrome leads to highly circumscribed pathology in the dorsal visual stream. This program of research demonstrates that neurocognitive architecture follows the same principles in typical and atypical development.