PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1431661

Clinical ethics in assisting euthanasia: avoiding malpractice in drug application.

G K Kimsma
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The debate on the ethical permissibility of euthanasia in medicine has a corollary in the ethical application of drugs. The overall moral limits of medical treatment apply evenly to the moral acceptability of the pharmacological aspect of the act of euthanasia. The pharmacological aspect of the act is of ethical importance not only for the person requesting an active ending of his or her life, but also for the grieving family.

Explore related subjects

Defensive MedicineEthics, MedicalEuthanasiaEuthanasia, Active, VoluntaryFemaleHumansMaleMalpracticeNetherlandsPatient AdvocacyStress, PsychologicalDeath and EuthanasiaDutch Voluntary Euthanasia SocietyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G K Kimsma. 1992. Clinical ethics in assisting euthanasia: avoiding malpractice in drug application.. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp%2F17.4.439

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Defensive medicine practices among gastroenterologists in Japan.

AIM: To clarify the prevalence of defensive medicine and the specific defensive medicine practices among gastroenterologists in Japan. METHODS: A survey of gastroenterologists in Hiroshima, Japan, was conducted by mail in March 2006. The number of gastroenterologists reporting defensive medicine behaviors or changes in their scope of practice and the reported defensive medicine practices, i.e., assurance and avoidance behaviors, were examined. RESULTS: A total of 131 (77%) out of 171 gastroenterologists completed the survey. Three (2%) respondents were sued, and most respondents (96%) had liability insurance. Nearly all respondents (98%) reported practicing defensive medicine. Avoidance behaviors, such as avoiding certain procedures or interventions and avoiding caring for high-risk patients, were very common (96%). Seventy-five percent of respondents reported often avoiding certain procedures or interventions. However, seasoned gastroenterologists (those in practice for more than 20 years) adopted avoidance behaviors significantly less often than those in practice for less than 10 years. Assurance behaviors, i.e., supplying additional services of marginal or no medical value, were also widespread (91%). Sixty-eight percent of respondents reported that they sometimes or often referred patients to other specialists unnecessarily. CONCLUSION: Defensive medicine may be highly prevalent among gastroenterologists throughout Japan, with potentially serious implications regarding costs, access, and both technical and interpersonal quality of care.

Defensive Medicine↗