Temporal patterning in cascade juggling.

P J Beek; M T Turvey

doi:10.1037//0096-1523.18.4.934

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1431756

Temporal patterning in cascade juggling.

P J Beek·M T Turvey

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A key variable in cascade juggling is the proportion of time that a juggler holds onto a juggled object during a hand cycle, that is, the time from catch to throw in relation to the time from catch to catch. Space-time constraints and principles of frequency locking suggest 3/4 as the primary ratio and 2/3 and 5/8 as the most accessible options. In 5 experiments, object number, mass, and type (ball or scarf) were manipulated together with the frequency at which the objects were juggled. With 5 or 7 balls, the ratio was 3/4, independent of frequency. With 3 balls, the ratio decreased with frequency, with 3/4, 2/3, and 5/8 tending to predominate independently of the force variations induced by variation in object mass. With 3 scarves, ratios varied inversely with frequency and often exceeded 3/4. Implications for a dynamical theory of juggling were discussed with the issue of relative timing in coordination and the manipulation of task constraints as an experimental strategy.

Explore related subjects

Attention Functional Laterality Humans Motor Skills Orientation Psychomotor Performance Psychophysics Reaction Time Stereotyped Behavior Time Perception Weight Perception Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

P J Beek, M T Turvey. 1992. Temporal patterning in cascade juggling.. https://doi.org/10.1037/%2F0096-1523.18.4.934

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1995

Visual attention to surfaces in three-dimensional space.

Although attention plays a significant role in vision, its spatial deployment and spread in the third dimension is not well understood. In visual search experiments we show that we cannot easily focus attention across isodepth loci unless they are part of a well-formed surface with locally coplanar elements. Yet we can easily spread our attention selectively across well-formed surfaces that span an extreme range of stereoscopic depths. In cueing experiments, we show that this spread of attention is, in part, obligatory. Attentional selectivity is reduced when targets and distractors are coplanar with or rest on a common receding stereoscopic plane. We conclude that attention cannot be efficiently allocated to arbitrary depths and extents in space but is linked to and spreads automatically across perceived surfaces.

Attention↗

PubMed1995

Superior parietal cortex activation during spatial attention shifts and visual feature conjunction.

Positron emission tomography was used to measure changes in the regional cerebral blood flow of normal people while they searched visual displays for targets defined by color, by motion, or by a conjunction of color and motion. A region in the superior parietal cortex was activated only during the conjunction task, at a location that had previously been shown to be engaged by successive shifts of spatial attention. Correspondingly, the time needed to detect a conjunction target increased with the number of items in the display, which is consistent with the use of a mechanism that successively analyzes each item in the visual field.

Attention↗

PubMed1995

Attention-generated apparent motion.

Motion perception mechanisms have recently been divided into three categories. First-order mechanisms primarily extract motion from moving objects or features that differ from the background in luminance. Second-order mechanism extract motion from moving properties, such as a moving area of flicker in which there is no difference in mean luminance between target and background. These first- and second-order motion mechanisms are primarily monocular. The existence of purely binocular, interocular and various other unusual kinds of apparent motion has promoted conjectures of a third-order mechanism, but there has been no clear suggestion as to the actual computations that such a mechanism might perform. Here we demonstrate 'alternating feature' stimuli that produce apparent motion only when the observer selectively attends to one of the embedded features in the display. The latent motion in the alternating feature stimuli is invisible to first- or second-order motion mechanisms, and the direction of apparent motion depends on the particular feature attended. These findings suggest the mechanism of third-order motion: the locations of the most significant features are registered in a salience map, and motion is computed directly from this map.

Attention↗