PubMed · 14318318
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
B L KINTZ, D J DELPRATO, D R METTEE, C E PERSONS, R H SCHAPPE. 1965. THE EXPERIMENTER EFFECT.. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021718
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
We sent questionnaires to 98 maxillofacial laboratories in the United Kingdom and asked about the composition of their staff, the kind of work that they do, and their activities in relation to the treatment of disfigured patients who require facial and body prostheses. We received 59 replies about 193 laboratory staff, most of whom had 10 or more years experience and held basic and advanced qualifications in dental technology. Most laboratories did all sorts of work including maxillofacial, orthodontic, dental prosthetic and crown and bridge work. Only five confined themselves to maxillofacial work. One hundred and eighteen staff (61%) had contact with 4,259 disfigured patients who required prostheses. Fifty-three laboratory managers (89%) thought that maxillofacial prosthetists and technologists gave psychological support to these patients, but only 12 laboratories (21%) had staff with formal training in counselling.
STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. OBJECTIVES: To review the literature about the performance of physicians as mediators of temporary and permanent disability for patients with chronic musculoskeletal complaints. To assess specifically the nature and variance of recommendations from physicians, factors influencing physician performance, and efforts to influence physician behavior in this area. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: While caring for patients with musculoskeletal injuries, physicians are often asked to recommend appropriate levels of activity and work. These recommendations have significant consequences for patients' general health, employment, and financial well-being. METHODS: Medical literature search. RESULTS: Physician recommendations limiting activity and work after injury are highly variable, often reflecting their own pain attitudes and beliefs. Patients' desires strongly predict disability recommendations (i.e., physicians often acquiesce to patients' requests). Other influences include jurisdiction, employer, insurer, and medical system factors. The most successful efforts to influence physician recommendations have used mass communication to influence public attitudes, while reinforcing the current standard of practice for physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Physician recommendations for work and activity have important health and financial implications. Systemic, multidimensional approaches are necessary to improve performance.
Advances in pharmacology and technology have sharply reduced mortality of extremely preterm infants at the expense of an increasing number of survivors with handicaps and disabilities. The EURONIC study among neonatal intensive care units across Europe demonstrates that treatment of infants born at the limits of viability raises challenging ethical, moral, legal, and emotional dilemmas among neonatologists, nurses, and parents alike. When is it wise to withhold or withdraw intensive care and, if so, what are the needs of the nonviable or dying infant, family, and neonatal staff to provide a humane and compassionate death? This process begins with a thorough determination of diagnosis and prognosis, followed by decision making on the basis of futility of treatment or quality-of-life issues, and counseling of parents. Withholding or withdrawing of intensive care should be synonymous with palliative care. Perinatal audit and after-care of the family complete the process. The Dutch viewpoint and practice guidelines on withholding and withdrawing of neonatal intensive care are presented.