PubMed · 14326199
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
D W BROWN, H D FRIEDMAN. 1965. VISUAL-CHARACTER DETECTION.. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1965.10544782
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Perception is the active construction of a neural state that correlates with biologically relevant elements present in the environment. This correlation, far from affording a one-to-one mapping, nonetheless guides our actions towards adaptive behaviors, thus being forged under evolutionary constraints. Since the construction of a percept is an intrinsically ambiguous process, perceptual discrepancies can arise from identical stimulation patterns. The recognition of these discrepancies is termed illusion, which originates, however, from the same physiological mechanisms that ordinarily lead to standard perception. Emanating from different sources, such as optical, sensory and cognitive factors, visual illusions are useful tools in accessing the physiological basis of perceptual processes and their interaction with motor planning and execution. Here we examine the biological roots of visual illusions and their interplay with some neurobiological, philosophical and esthetical issues.
The visual perception of object shape depends on 'holistic' processing in which a given dimension cannot be perceptually isolated from the other dimensions of the object. The visual control of action (such as grasping an object), however, which is mediated by cortical areas that are largely independent of those mediating conscious perception, must take into account only the most action-relevant dimension of an object without being misled by other non-relevant object features. Here we report the results of two experiments showing that vision for perception and vision for action deal with objects in a fundamentally different manner. We tested participants' ability to make perceptual judgements of the width of different rectangular objects or to grasp them across their width, while in both cases ignoring length. Participants could not ignore length when making perceptual judgements of width but they could completely ignore length when grasping the same objects. These results suggest that in situations in which the elementary dimensions of an object's shape are perceived in a holistic manner, the same dimensions are treated analytically when a visually guided action is directed at that same object.
A new psychophysical study has examined the free flow of perception as observers viewed stimuli with several possible visual interpretations. The results suggest that our subjective impression of such ambiguous patterns may be more closely linked to the brain's encoding of complex shape than previously appreciated.