PubMed · 1435141
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
I B Dolbnev. [Improved technology for producing metalloceramic dental prostheses].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1435141/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Metal reinforced glass-ionomer cements are said to possess superior mechanical properties when compared to non-metal reinforced glass-ionomer cements. However, the literature to date does not always support this view, owing to the variety of materials and test methods employed. In this study the mechanical properties of three reinforced and three standard materials were tested using the standard specification tests of compressive and diametral strength in addition to tensile strength using the four point bend test. The tensile strength was also measured using the shell test in order that this test, which on theoretical grounds is more suited to these materials, may be evaluated. Six specimens of each material were prepared for each of the test modalities resulting in the conclusion that the addition of metal to glass-ionomer cements can markedly increase the strength of the materials. However, the method of fusing the metal to the glass rather than by simple addition does not produce any advantages in strength. In this evaluation one reinforced material was significantly stronger than all other materials in all four test modalities. The compressive strength test which appears in most standards does not appear to be very discriminatory. Of the tensile tests, which have more clinical significance, the results of the diametral strength tests, which are included in some standards, appear to be at variance with the other two tensile tests, suggesting that the flexural or shell test would be more appropriate.
This in vitro study assessed the sealing properties of two metal-reinforced glass ionomer cements, used as "extended bases" in glass ionomer-composite resin restorations. Two class II cavities were prepared in the proximal surfaces of 30 molars. The gingival margin of one was prepared in enamel and the other in cementum/dentin. Fifteen teeth (30 cavities) were restored with Ketac Silver material used as an extended base (group A). In the remaining 15 teeth (30 cavities), the extended base was in Miracle Mix material (group B). All occlusal surfaces were restored with Estilux Posterior Material. The restored teeth were thermocycled, immersed in fuchsin, washed in water, embedded, sectioned, and examined under a dissecting microscope. All restorations with margins in cementum/dentin of group A (Ketac Silver) leaked. No microleakage occurred in 12 of the 30 restorations with margins in cementum/dentin of group B (Miracle Mix). In addition, severe microleakage was present in 24 teeth of group A, as opposed to three in group B. It was concluded that the sealing properties of Miracle Mix material are superior to those of Ketac Silver material, in vitro.