PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14513225

[Ambulatory vasectomy. Risks and complications].

Abstract

Vasectomy is the simplest and most effective method of permanent sterilization in men. In most cases, the surgical technique includes conventional vasoresection with incision of the scrotal skin or no-scalpel vasectomy as a minimally invasive method. The most important complications following surgery are haemorrhage and haematoma (1.2%), infection (3.5%), epididymitis/epididymo-orchitis (2.1%), sperm granuloma (2-70%), and chronic pain (3-8%). No long-term negative organic effects have been proven in clinical studies. The surgeon's experience and the technique applied are essential for the postoperative course, whereas performing vasectomy either on an in-patient or out-patient basis does not seem to have an influence. To evaluate the success of the vasectomy, follow-up spermiograms are obligatory. If immotile spermatozoa are present further follow-ups are necessary. Vasectomy needs to be reperformed if motile spermatozoa are detected. The chance of an unsuccessful vasectomy is below 1%. Unprotected intercourse must not be performed before two consecutive spermiograms show azoospermia.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Leissner, F Reiher, M Böhm, E P Allhoff. 2003. [Ambulatory vasectomy. Risks and complications].. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-003-0402-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The literature was reviewed to describe the role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory children with cerebral palsy and examine the current best evidence to support these roles. RECENT FINDINGS: Gait laboratory analysis is superior to visual or observational analysis of gait because it provides an objective record of gait that is able to quantify the magnitude of deviations of pathologic gait from normal and also explain these abnormalities. Recognizable gait patterns can be classified and used for making treatment decisions, the effectiveness of which can be assessed using gait analysis as a measure of gait outcomes. There are many sources of variability, however, including patients themselves, the gait laboratories and testing processes, interpretation of data and surgeons' surgical recommendations. SUMMARY: Although gait analysis has been shown to alter decision making, there is little evidence that the decisions based on gait analysis lead to better outcomes. Consequently, clinical gait analysis remains controversial, with wide variation in the rates of utilization of gait analysis in the management of children with ambulatory cerebral palsy. The time is ripe for clinical trials and cohort studies to provide the evidence to establish the appropriate utilization of this technology.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗