PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14529358

Vaccine development for potential bioterrorism agents.

Abstract

Vaccines are considered to be one of the most effective ways of combating disease caused by bioterrorism agents. Such vaccines must be able to provide protection against pathogens which might enter the body by a number of routes, including the respiratory tract. They should also be able to induce protective immunity rapidly and would ideally be given non-invasively. There are few vaccines which currently meet these requirements. In part, this reflects the low level of research on many bioterrorism agents over the past few decades. Little is known about basic mechanisms of pathogenicity of many of these agents. However, by their very nature these agents cause serious disease, and must be handled in high containment laboratories. This requirement also limits the speed and ease with which research on these pathogens can now take place. Against this background, research on vaccines against potential bioterrorism agents is likely to proceed along two lines. Firstly because the genome sequences of most of the principal bioterrorism agents have either been completed or are close to completion, there is likely to be reliance on the exploitation of this information to devise improved vaccines. A number of groups are working on methodologies to identify vaccine antigens directly from genome sequences. Secondly, there will be a need to formulate such vaccines appropriately for the rapid induction of protective immunity after non-invasive delivery. The prospects for the development of a new generation of bioterrorism vaccines which exploit these technologies are reviewed in this manuscript.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R W Titball, E D Williamson. 2003. Vaccine development for potential bioterrorism agents.. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568005033481097

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

GeneChip resequencing of the smallpox virus genome can identify novel strains: a biodefense application.

We developed a set of seven resequencing GeneChips, based on the complete genome sequences of 24 strains of smallpox virus (variola virus), for rapid characterization of this human-pathogenic virus. Each GeneChip was designed to analyze a divergent segment of approximately 30,000 bases of the smallpox virus genome. This study includes the hybridization results of 14 smallpox virus strains. Of the 14 smallpox virus strains hybridized, only 7 had sequence information included in the design of the smallpox virus resequencing GeneChips; similar information for the remaining strains was not tiled as a reference in these GeneChips. By use of variola virus-specific primers and long-range PCR, 22 overlapping amplicons were amplified to cover nearly the complete genome and hybridized with the smallpox virus resequencing GeneChip set. These GeneChips were successful in generating nucleotide sequences for all 14 of the smallpox virus strains hybridized. Analysis of the data indicated that the GeneChip resequencing by hybridization was fast and reproducible and that the smallpox virus resequencing GeneChips could differentiate the 14 smallpox virus strains characterized. This study also suggests that high-density resequencing GeneChips have potential biodefense applications and may be used as an alternate tool for rapid identification of smallpox virus in the future.

Bioterrorism↗

Business and public health collaboration for emergency preparedness in Georgia: a case study.

BACKGROUND: Governments may be overwhelmed by a large-scale public health emergency, such as a massive bioterrorist attack or natural disaster, requiring collaboration with businesses and other community partners to respond effectively. In Georgia, public health officials and members of the Business Executives for National Security have successfully collaborated to develop and test procedures for dispensing medications from the Strategic National Stockpile. Lessons learned from this collaboration should be useful to other public health and business leaders interested in developing similar partnerships. METHODS: The authors conducted a case study based on interviews with 26 government, business, and academic participants in this collaboration. RESULTS: The partnership is based on shared objectives to protect public health and assure community cohesion in the wake of a large-scale disaster, on the recognition that acting alone neither public health agencies nor businesses are likely to manage such a response successfully, and on the realization that business and community continuity are intertwined. The partnership has required participants to acknowledge and address multiple challenges, including differences in business and government cultures and operational constraints, such as concerns about the confidentiality of shared information, liability, and the limits of volunteerism. The partnership has been facilitated by a business model based on defining shared objectives, identifying mutual needs and vulnerabilities, developing carefully-defined projects, and evaluating proposed project methods through exercise testing. Through collaborative engagement in progressively more complex projects, increasing trust and understanding have enabled the partners to make significant progress in addressing these challenges. CONCLUSION: As a result of this partnership, essential relationships have been established, substantial private resources and capabilities have been engaged in government preparedness programs, and a model for collaborative, emergency mass dispensing of pharmaceuticals has been developed, tested, and slated for expansion. The lessons learned from this collaboration in Georgia should be considered by other government and business leaders seeking to develop similar partnerships.

Bioterrorism↗