PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 145521

[Spinal anesthesia (author's transl)].

Abstract

Because of our own experiences with more than 10,000 cases of spinal anesthesia without neurologic complications, it is emphasized that the method has regained clinical importance due to modernized techniques, new local anesthetics (lidocain, mepivacain, bupivacain), and a better understanding of the pathomechanisms involved. Restricting the spinal block to the D 8 dermatome level, thus avoiding side effects, and sticking to a clear-cut range of contraindications renders spinal anesthesia a method that compares favorably with that of general anesthesia in the high-risk patient.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Bergmann. 1977. [Spinal anesthesia (author's transl)].. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01305530

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Regional anesthesia in emergency cesarean section. Quality of epidural and spinal anesthesia].

From 1987 to 1989, 97.8% of non-elective caesarean sections at Innherred general hospital were performed under regional anaesthesia (N = 271). A retrospective analysis showed that the mean time from giving the anaesthetic until start of surgery was 28.1 min. with epidural anaesthesia and 12.7 min. with spinal anaesthesia. Mean time was 25.9 and 9.3 min. respectively in cases of suspected asphyxia. In eight women primary anesthesia was unsuccessful; six received further spinal anaesthesia and two general anaesthesia. Regional anaesthesia is considered safe for the purpose, but in cases of serious asphyxia there is some controversy as to whether spinal or general anaesthesia is to be preferred.

Anesthesia, Epidural