PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14569183

Marginal structural models as a tool for standardization.

Abstract

In this article, we show the general relation between standardization methods and marginal structural models. Standardization has been recognized as a method to control confounding and to estimate causal parameters of interest. Because standardization requires stratification by confounders, the sparse-data problem will occur when stratified by many confounders and one then might have an unstable estimator. A new class of causal models called marginal structural models has recently been proposed. In marginal structural models, the parameters are consistently estimated by the inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting method. Marginal structural models give a nonparametric standardization using the total group (exposed and unexposed) as the standard. In epidemiologic analysis, it is also important to know the change in the average risk of the exposed (or the unexposed) subgroup produced by exposure, which corresponds to the exposed (or the unexposed) group as the standard. We propose modifications of the weights in the marginal structural models, which give the nonparametric estimation of standardized parameters. With the proposed weights, we can use the marginal structural models as a useful tool for the nonparametric multivariate standardization.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tosiya Sato, Yutaka Matsuyama. 2003. Marginal structural models as a tool for standardization.. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000081989.82616.7d

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Epigenetic mechanisms in breast cancer therapy and resistance.

The majority of breast cancers express the estrogen receptor (ERα) and agents targeting this pathway represent the main treatment modality. Endocrine therapy has proven successful in the treatment of hormone-responsive breast cancer since its early adoption in the 1940s as an ablative therapy. Unfortunately, therapeutic resistance arises, leading to disease recurrence and relapse. Recent studies increased our understanding in how changes to the chromatin landscape and deregulation of epigenetic factors orchestrate the resistant phenotype. Here, we will discuss how the epigenome is an integral determinant in hormone therapy response and why epigenetic factors are promising targets for overcoming clinical resistance.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

Differential response to phytoestrogens in endocrine sensitive and resistant breast cancer cells in vitro.

Women approaching menopause increasingly investigate alternatives to hormone replacement therapy. Plant phytoestrogens are being promoted as "natural" alternatives but there is a lack of substantive data to advocate their safe use in breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen (TAM), or in those who have relapsed. The aim of our study was to investigate the proliferative effects and mode of action of the phytoestrogens genistein, daidzein and coumestrol on TAM-sensitive (-s) and resistant (-r) breast cancer cells under in vitro conditions designed to mimic the hormonal environment of the pre- and post-menopausal breast. At physiological concentrations (<10 microM) and under reduced estrogen (E2) conditions, genistein was mitogenic to TAM-s cells with TAM-r cells generally refractory. Daidzein and coumestrol were growth stimulatory irrespective of TAM sensitivity. Transcriptional activity was ERE-mediated. Combining phytoestrogens with E2 (simulating the pre-menopausal breast environment) had no effect on growth of TAM-s or TAM-r cells. Addition of 4-HT mimicked the hormonal environment in post-menopausal breast cancer patients receiving TAM. The growth inhibitory effects of 4-HT were abrogated in TAM-s cells when combined with genistein and coumestrol, and to a lesser extent, daidzein, where significant growth stimulatory effects were observed. In TAM-r cells, proliferation did not exceed control values. At phytoestrogen concentrations above 10 microM, growth inhibitory effects were seen, irrespective of estrogenic environment or cell sensitivity to TAM. Our in vitro data suggests that phytoestrogens could have potentially adverse mitogenic effects on tumour cells and should probably be avoided by patients who remain sensitive to TAM or in those with pre-existing and possibly undiagnosed breast tumours.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

Endometrial cancer patients and tibolone: a matched case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether tibolone had adverse effects on the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients. METHODS: In this retrospective matched case-control study, out of 396 patients with endometrial cancer from January 1997 to December 2002, 68 patients who underwent complete surgical staging were identified as tibolone users (cases). For each case, one control as tibolone non-user was matched for stage and grade of disease, in this order of priority (ratio users: non-users, 1:1). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age (p = 0.11), stage (p = 1.00), grade (p = 0.96) and treatment modality (p = 0.55) between two arms. The mean duration of follow-up for tibolone users and tibolone non-users is 48.0 months and 54.4 months, respectively (p = 0.12). In tibolone users, a total of four patients recurred and two out of four patients died of disease. In tibolone non-users, there were three recurrences and all of three patients died of disease. There were no significant differences in disease free survival (p = 0.52) and overall survival (p = 0.61) between two arms. And there was no significant difference in disease free survival according to the duration of tibolone use (p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: There was no evidence that tibolone had adverse effects on the disease free survival and overall survival of endometrial cancer patients. So, tibolone could be used in these patients.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗