PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14582949

Developing facilitation skills--a narrative.

Abstract

Effective facilitation has been identified in the literature as one of three elements, along with context and evidence, that have a dynamic and coexisting relationship to enable the successful uptake of evidence into practice. This paper presents an overview of the concept of facilitation within the context of practice development, ahead of a personal and professional reflective account of a 'developing facilitator'. In the summer of 2001, the author was instrumental in organising the first Practice Development School in Melbourne. Thrown in at the deep end, she found herself co-facilitating with an experienced practice developer from the United Kingdom. Having never facilitated in the arena of an action learning group, nor worked in the field of practice development, there was initially a sense of impending overload and drowning in the new knowledge and skills that needed to be acquired. Drawing upon the work of narrative inquiry the author shares her experiences in the anticipation that in telling her story it will assist others in their journey of becoming a facilitator.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jennifer M Newton. 2003. Developing facilitation skills--a narrative.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1322-7696(08)60063-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Evidence-based diagnostic strategies for evaluating suspected allergic rhinitis.

Allergic rhinitis is an increasingly common disease, with a prevalence of at least 10% to 25% in the United States. Diagnostic allergy tests, such as skin tests and in vitro tests, can assist clinicians in determining whether nasal symptoms are allergic in origin. In addition, safe and effective medications are available to treat allergic rhinitis. The initial strategy should be to determine whether patients should undergo diagnostic testing or receive empirical treatment. This paper reviews the test characteristics of the history, skin tests, and in vitro tests in diagnosing allergic rhinitis from the perspective of decision thresholds. A combination of pertinent medical history features in a practice with a high baseline prevalence of allergic rhinitis justifies the common practice of empirical treatment since allergy medication has minimal toxicity and side effects. The situation is more complex when the patient needs a diagnostic test, because reported sensitivities and specificities of skin tests and in vitro tests vary widely. As a result, it is difficult to calculate the post-test probability of allergic rhinitis with any confidence. The decision to initiate diagnostic testing must rely on clinical judgment to select patients who would benefit most from determining their allergic status while minimizing unnecessary testing and medications. Diagnosing allergy to a specific antigen allows patients to avoid the allergen and makes them candidates for allergen immunotherapy, which can decrease the need for medications.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗

Orthodontics. Part 7: Fact and fantasy in orthodontics.

Clinical research has previously lacked good methodology and much opinion was based on anecdote which is widely regarded as the weakest form of clinical evidence. There are few randomised control trials in orthodontics which support or refute areas of dogma. The number of randomised control trials is increasing significantly. There is currently however no good evidence that orthodontics causes or cures temporomandibular joint dysfunction, that appropriate extractions in orthodontics ruin patients' profiles, or that the orthodontist is able to significantly influence facial growth with appliances.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗