PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14584617

Terminological problems in information retrieval.

Abstract

This is the first in the series of the papers on an application of the systems analytic approach to evaluation of information retrieval (IR). At the beginning, the importance of consistent terminology in information retrieval is discussed, and different definitions of "information retrieval" and "IR system" are presented. The importance of identifying boundaries of the IR system for clarifying terminological differences is discussed. The terminological problems in IR are summarized, and some of the existing approaches to their solution are identified. A historical overview of IR research is presented in order to explain the existing terminological differences and to create a common basis for a discussion of evaluation approaches to IR.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuri Kagolovsky, Jochen R Moehr. 2003. Terminological problems in information retrieval.. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1025687220609

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Electronic searching to locate qualitative research: evaluation of three strategies.

AIM: This paper presents an evaluation of the effectiveness of three search strategies to identify research for a qualitative synthesis of patient experiences of living with a leg ulcer. BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews of research are increasingly the form of evidence used for evaluation of health care. There are well-established methods for conducting systematic reviews of effectiveness incorporating randomized controlled trials. Methods have been developed for the synthesis of qualitative research, but these are not widely used or evaluated. Searching for qualitative research is one of the least developed and tested areas in systematic reviewing of qualitative research. METHOD: The replication of three search strategies (free text, thesaurus and broad-based terms) developed for identification of qualitative research papers within electronic databases is described. Each strategy was run in seven electronic databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, British Nursing Index, Social Science Citation Index, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, PsychInfo. The effectiveness of these strategies for identifying qualitative research for a synthesis of patients' experiences of living with a leg ulcer is discussed. FINDINGS: Each of the three search strategies produced similar numbers of potentially and actually relevant papers from each of the seven databases. These results were most striking for CINAHL, when all of the papers ultimately included in the review were identified by each search strategy. No other database identified all included papers. CONCLUSION: A simple search strategy using broad-based terms was as effective as a complex one (free text) in locating qualitative research examining patients' experiences of living with a leg ulcer. For a question with a clear nursing focus, it may be sufficient to search only CINAHL in order to locate qualitative research. This result needs replicating with other nursing topics.

Databases, Bibliographic↗

PubMed vs. HighWire Press: a head-to-head comparison of two medical literature search engines.

PubMed and HighWire Press are both useful medical literature search engines available for free to anyone on the internet. We measured retrieval accuracy, number of results generated, retrieval speed, features and search tools on HighWire Press and PubMed using the quick search features of each. We found that using HighWire Press resulted in a higher likelihood of retrieving the desired article and higher number of search results than the same search on PubMed. PubMed was faster than HighWire Press in delivering search results regardless of search settings. There are considerable differences in search features between these two search engines.

Databases, Bibliographic↗

Informed choice in screening programmes: do leaflets help? A critical literature review.

BACKGROUND: Screening programmes aim to maximise population benefit by maximizing uptake but must also allow informed choice about participation. Many programmes provide potential participants with information leaflets. This article reviews studies of the effectiveness of leaflets in promoting informed choice in screening. METHODS: I searched 15 electronic databases and the websites of UK screening programmes, searched the bibliographies of identified studies and contacted experts in the field. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials where an attempt had been made to determine the contribution of leaflets to the exercise of informed choice in screening decisions were included. RESULTS: I identified nine trials from various screening programmes. Outcome measures included knowledge, attitudes to screening, intention to be screened, uptake, anxiety, satisfaction with decision-making, discussions about screening with care providers and agreement that enough information had been provided to allow informed choice. Most studies demonstrated that providing written information increased knowledge, but evidence that this promoted informed choice was poor. CONCLUSIONS: Research into informed choice in screening is hampered by the lack of agreement about its definition and measurement. The most effective way for screening programmes to achieve informed choice is unclear. Programmes should not rely solely on providing written information but should explore additional ways to promote informed choice.

Databases, Bibliographic↗